Hello intervals are link specific. I'm not sure why varying hello timers on different links would be relevant.
At 06:23 PM 2/4/2002 -0500, Walter Rogowski wrote: >If you debug ospf adjacencies you might see complaints re mismatched >hello intervals. > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of >Baker, Jason >Sent: 04 February 2002 22:51 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: OSPF DR problem [7:34379] > > >hmmm in ospf NBMA network i thought when you specified point to point >there was no DR, BDR election. > >so maybe playing with the priorities may have caused problems > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kane, Christopher A. [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, 5 February 2002 9:36 am > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: OSPF DR problem [7:34379] > > > > Priscilla, > > > > Now that you have R1 as the DR, it's his responsibility to announce > > that network out to everyone else. Is R1 sending out LSAs (Network > > LSA, type 2) to wherever it is that you are trying to see that > > network? (Is it R3's routing table that you can't see the Ethernet > > segment of R1 and R2?) Does the network show up in the OSPF database > > but not the routing table? Or just the routing table? > > > > Chris > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 4:31 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: OSPF DR problem [7:34379] > > > > > > Hi Group Study, > > > > Playing with IP OSPF priority to influence which router became the > > Designated Router (DR) caused routing problems for me in a recent bout > > > with a lab exercise. Can anyone help me understand if I did something > > wrong? > > > > I have 2 routers on an Ethernet LAN. Both of them also have WAN > > connections to remote sites. R1 has a Frame Relay link to the > > corporate "cloud" via its > > S0 port. S0 is configured as "ip ospf network point-to-point." > > > > R2 has an ISDN link to yet another router, R3. This link is configured > > > as an OSPF point-to-point demand circuit. > > > > R1 and R2 are connected via an Ethernet switch. My goal was to make > > sure R1 became the DR on Ethernet. Both routers have loopbacks, but > > R2's is higher, > > so to make sure R2 did not become the DR, I configured it with: > > > > ip ospf priority 0 > > > > R1 then did indeed become the DR on the Ethernet LAN because it was > > using the default priority 1. > > > > Now, finally to the question...... On the other side of the ISDN and > > across the Frame Relay cloud, I couldn't see the Ethernet LAN in the > > routing table. Routers formed adjacencies correctly and could reach > > most networks, > > > > but not that darn Ethernet LAN. R1 and R2 on the Ethernet LAN formed > > an adjacency and could see the rest of the internetwork. > > > > Could I have broken something by playing with the priority?? > > > > Thanks for your help. > > > > Priscilla > > > > > > > > ________________________ > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > > http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34458&t=34379 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
