I'm curious about the EIGRP bandwidth being reported at 2.5 billion bps. what kind of a network you running there, PO? ;->
see below: ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > At 07:03 PM 2/20/02, Steven A. Ridder wrote: > >It's not in a packet that gets sent. > > It is actually. Here's a packet for you: > > DLC: ----- DLC Header ----- > DLC: Destination = Station Cisco1053E80 > DLC: Source = Station Cisco1002E75 > DLC: Ethertype = 0800 (IP) > IP: ----- IP Header ----- > IP: Version = 4, header length = 20 bytes > IP: Type of service = 00 > IP: 000. .... = routine > IP: ...0 .... = normal delay > IP: .... 0... = normal throughput > IP: .... .0.. = normal reliability > IP: Total length = 68 bytes > IP: Identification = 0 > IP: Flags = 0X > IP: .0.. .... = may fragment > IP: ..0. .... = last fragment > IP: Fragment offset = 0 bytes > IP: Time to live = 2 seconds/hops > IP: Protocol = 88 (EIGRP) > IP: Header checksum = 4C3F (correct) > IP: Source address = [172.16.10.2] Charlotte > IP: Destination address = [172.16.10.1] Albany > IP: No options > EIGRP: ----- Enhanced IGRP Header ----- > EIGRP: > EIGRP: Version = 2 > EIGRP: Opcode = 1 (Update) > EIGRP: EIGRP Checksum = E17D (correct) > EIGRP: Flags (unused) = 0000 > EIGRP: Flags = 0001 > EIGRP: .... .... .... ..0. = Conditionally receive mode is not > required > EIGRP: .... .... .... ...1 = Is an initial update packet > EIGRP: Sequence number = 1 > EIGRP: Acknowledgment number = 0 > EIGRP: Autonomous System number = 100 > EIGRP: > EIGRP: Protocol ID = 0x01 (IP) > EIGRP: Type Code = 0x0102 (IP Internal Routes) > EIGRP: Field length = 28 > EIGRP: Next hop address = 0 (use source IP addr) > EIGRP: Time delay (10 msec/256) = 512000 EIGRP: Path bandwidth (2,560,000,000/kbps) = 1657856 EIGRP: Min/max transmission unit (MTU) = 1500 > EIGRP: Hop count = 0 > EIGRP: Reliability (error percentage) = 250 > EIGRP: Load utilization percentage = 1 > EIGRP: Reserved > EIGRP: Prefix length in bits = 24 > EIGRP: IP Destination Address = 0.172.16.40 > > Priscilla > > > > >""Sasa Milic"" wrote in message > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > The router DOES pass total delay and minumum bandwidth of the route > > > to neighbors. > > > > > > check "show ip eigrp topologu > > > > > > Sasa > > > CCIE No 8635 > > > > > > > > > > > > "Steven A. Ridder" wrote: > > > > > > > > I believe the delay is by default set on the interface by the router > >based > > > > on the type of link it is. I'm sure there's charts on CCO somewhere. > >You > > > > can change this info on the interface with the delay command, which is > >the > > > > recommended way of changing a metric if you are forced to do so. The > > > router > > > > dosen't pass the delay info of a link to other routers as a raw figure, > >it > > > > calculates the BW and delay, then multiplies it by 256 and sends that > > > > calculation to a neighbor, which is the metric. > > > > > > > > ""Yatou Wu"" wrote in message > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > In EIGRP, the delay metric is taken as configured in the interface of > >the > > > > > router by the administrator, by default, or by measurement? > > > > > > > > > > when the router calculates the metric, it needs to know the minimum > > > > > bandwidth along the path, and also the delay along the path. how can > >the > > > > > router pass the infor around? pass the total delay along the path, or > > > > delay > > > > > of every link? > > > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > > yatou > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at > > > > http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. > ________________________ > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36036&t=36001 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]