Last I heard / checked this is not an option on the PIX. Documentation is very explicit - one for one mapping.
The typical workaround is to add a secondary ip address to the machine. We have done this repeatedly; for DNS changes, for ISP address space changes, etc. Thanks! TJ -----Original Message----- From: Gaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Pix NAT - Two to one [7:37179] Eventually, two separate static commands for two separate outside addresses going to two separate DMZ addresses. At the moment there is just one machine inside. Possibility of putting multiple addresses on the server but preferred option is not to do this. What I would like to miss out is the time required to wait for DNS to propagate when I split the single outside address to two. If I can leave the DNS pointing to two addresses and make the changes at the required time, there is no delay involved. Thanks, Gaz ""Patrick Ramsey"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].; > what is the overall goal? > > >>> Gaz 03/04/02 03:06PM >>> > Hi all, > > Has anybody tried NAT'ing two outside addresses to one internal (DMZ) > address on the same port (80) in some way. > Not too difficult to get round, as I can get the DNS of one site changed and > use the single address outside to single inside. > The advantage would be that when the web sites are separated, to two > machines inside, I would like to be able to change the pix settings > immediately rather than change DNS and wait a couple of days for DNS to > propagate. > I'm sure there may be some simple way of doing it, but I couldn't find it > whilst playing about today. > > Any ideas welcome. > > Thanks, > > Gaz > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Confidentiality Disclaimer This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and > /or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System, > Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom > addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be > privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If > the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby > notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or > copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may > subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this > email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this > email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you. > > ================================================================ ***************************************************************************** The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. ***************************************************************************** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37250&t=37179 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
