I don't see this as an issue. ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I've been noticing a growing trend on the list for several months now > and I'm hoping to start some discussion and perhaps alleviate this > particular issue. > > As everyone knows we have a fair number of true, guru-level experts > that participate in the list and provide a wealth of excellent > networking knowledge. However, very often this isn't Cisco-specific and > as such is not of much value and it really seems to irritate other > members of the list who understand that the only topics worth studying > are Cisco-related. > > To make matters even worse, many of these so-called experts aren't even > Cisco certified!! I was under the impression that to be a true expert > one must have attained the CCIE certification, or at least CCNP with > multiple specializations. How can we trust your advice if you we don't > see those initials in your email sigs?? > > Participation on the list by these sorts of experts, regardless of > there vast experience and knowledge, causes excessive distress to > certain list members. In order to show more tolerance toward the easily > annoyed, perhaps we should consider only allowing CCIEs to answer posts. > I'm sure others would agree that this would solve this problem. We > must find a way to prune the non-certified from our ranks. > > Regards, > > John advice unless you've passed some sort of parenting certification. > Thanks.)
Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43010&t=42996 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
