I asked Cisco, and STP treats the stack as separate switches.

""Chuck""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> in your travels have you ever run into the gigastack, and its relation to
> STP?
>
> the question came up a short time ago. The Cisco gigastack documentation
> does not cover STP - only how gigastack works.
>
> essentially, using daisy chained gigastack connections, one can connect up
> to 9 switches. If I understand correctly, the Cisco electronics and switch
> OS consider this stack a single entity for management purposes - i.e. can
be
> managed from a single IP address. However, Cisco does not say one way or
> another if the electronics and the switch OS treat this stack as a single
> device for STP purposes.
>
> I'm guessing, based on this and other discussions that it would have to be
a
> single device for STP purposes. It just would be nice if Cisco would
provide
> the specific information.
>
> That brings up the corollary question - if you have on two switches
> gigastacked, then how does STP come into play. In a configuration such as
> this, again if I understand the documentation correctly, the electronics
and
> the switch OS behave differently.
>
>
>
>
> ""Leigh Anne Chisholm""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Actually, the 5-4-3 rule has everything to do with detecting collisions.
> > It's
> > a limiting factor of distance so that a collision will be detected
within
> the
> > first 64 bytes of a frame's transmission (also known as Ethernet's
minimum
> > frame size).  It's preferable to detect a collision before the frame
> leaves
> > the buffer of the transmitting interface - so that retransmission can be
> > accomplished at the data link layer rather than left to upper layers.
> >
> > Several months ago, Priscilla and I debated the 7 switch rule.  If you
> wanted
> > to search the archives for the entire thread, it was titled "What's the
> > diameter of your switched network? [7:17489]" and was discussed at the
end
> of
> > August, 2001.  Here's an excerpt from one of my posts regarding the 7
hop
> > limit:
> >
> > From other statements I've read (Cisco published material) and from the
> > original excerpt I published, I'd imagine that the placement of the root
> does
> > matter.
> >
> > "Part of this restriction is coming from the age field BPDU carry:
> > when a BPDU is propagated from the root bridge towards the leaves of the
> > tree, the age field is incremented each time it goes though a bridge.
> > Eventually, when the age field of a BPDU goes beyond max age, it is
> > discarded. Typically, this will occur if the root is too far away from
> some
> > bridges of the network. This issue will impact convergence of the
spanning
> > tree."
> >
> > I'd think that if a bridge were to be the third bridge away from the
root,
> > and
> > another switch was the third bridge on the far side of the root, I
> wouldn't
> > expect to see any problems with MaxAge because I can't see the root
being
> too
> > far from some of the bridges in the network.  Now if a bridge were to be
> the
> > seventh, I could see how that would impose a greater delay and possibly
> > negatively impact the MaxAge parameter.  Now my question would be...
does
> > this
> > really apply in today's networks or is this more of a limitation of
> > yesteryear's "software-based bridges"?
> >
> > And essentially, that's the conclusion Priscilla and I came to - that
the
> 7
> > hop radius doesn't really seem to apply to today's switched
> environments...
> > You might want to check with her again though - Priscilla just authored
a
> new
> > book on troubleshooting campus networks and may updated her thinking.
> >
> >
> >   -- Leigh Anne Chisholm (CCNP, CCDP)  -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > > Steven A. Ridder
> > > Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2002 5:16 AM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: STP and 7 hops [7:44408]
> > >
> > >
> > > I believe the 5-4-3 rule is for repeaters, not switches.
> > >
> > >
> > > ""Brian Hill""  wrote in message
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > Steven,
> > > >
> > > > The 7 hop limit is from the root bridge, as STP calculates the tree
> from
> > > the
> > > > root. Historically, I am not sure why it's 7, but Ethernet has a
base
> hop
> > > > "limit" of 4 switches (5-4-3 rule), so it doesn't really matter so
> much.
> > > The
> > > > reason for the 4 hop limit in Ethernet is simple: For 10 Mb or full
> > duplex
> > > > 100 Mb connections, the limit is mostly to reduce noise from the
> > > > amplification of the signal as it passes through the switches/hubs,
> where
> > > as
> > > > in 100Mb half-duplex connections, it is mostly to keep the
propogation
> > > delay
> > > > within specs.
> > > >
> > > > Hope this helps,
> > > >
> > > > Brian Hill
> > > > CCNP, CCDP, MCSE 2000 (Charter Member),MCSE+I (NT4.0),
> > > > MCSA (Charter Member), MCP+I, MCP(21), Inet+, Net+, A+
> > > > Lead Technology Architect, TechTrain
> > > > Author: Cisco, The Complete Reference
> > > > http://www.alfageek.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44483&t=44408
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to