Here's the address for the 802.x documents from IEEE:

pad
pad
pad

http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/

--

RFC 1149 Compliant.
Get in my head:
http://sar.dynu.com


""Brian Hill""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> >
> > The IEEE annex that covered full-duplex (802.3x) probably
> > didn't mention
> > slot time. That annex was rolled into the 802.3 2000 edition,
> > however,
> > which of course does cover slot time since it still covers
> > CSMA/CD,
> > repeaters, etc. (in addition to full-duplex operation.)
> >
>
> Thanks, I was beginning to think I had bad info on slot time as well. It
> turns out you were saying that all devices that use CSMA/CD (i.e.
> multiaccess), not all Ethernet devices, use the slot time, which is how I
> understood it in the first place, I just misunderstood what you were
saying :(
>
>
> > Well, now we are getting into EE talk. ;-) Everything is analog
> > at some
> > level, isn't it? But an Ethernet repeater works on a Manchester
> > encoded
> > digital signal. (MLT-3 encoding for 100 Mbps). I think your
> > second
> > statement is closest to the truth (that the repeater converts
> > the analog
> > signal into a digital representation and creates a new analog
> > signal). But
> > I don't know the exact details.
>
> Great, that makes perfect sense :) There is that Manchester encoding
again.
> Do you know where I can find good documentation on it?
>
> >
> > I'm sorry I was so punchy in the previous message.
> >
>
> No problem Priscilla :) You guys (and gals) actually cleared up a lot of
old
> misconceptions in this whole long list of stuff, which is great
considering
> that documents on the dirty inner workings of Ethernet are hard to find
> unless you happen to be an IEEE member. :P




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44514&t=44408
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to