In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote: > been very easy to configured and very fast converged comparing to RIP/RIPv2.
Anything is fast compared to RIP/RIPv2 ;-) > It seems OSPF gets lots of favor as a stardard protocol. I am curious if > OSPF support load sharing on equal / unequal paths? Only equal cost paths are taken into consideration when using OSPF. The default is four of them. You can change it with maximum-paths under "router ospf." // kaj Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62473&t=62419 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
