actually rip is faster than IGRP
""[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kaj J. Niemi)"" a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote: > > > been very easy to configured and very fast converged comparing to > RIP/RIPv2. > > Anything is fast compared to RIP/RIPv2 ;-) > > > It seems OSPF gets lots of favor as a stardard protocol. I am curious if > > OSPF support load sharing on equal / unequal paths? > > Only equal cost paths are taken into consideration when using OSPF. The > default is four of them. You can change it with maximum-paths under > "router ospf." > > > > > // kaj Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62646&t=62419 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
