On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Stephen C. Gilardi <squee...@mac.com> wrote: > Because parallel bindings are also useful, I think it's an interesting idea > to extend let to allow it to take parallel bindings in a map instead of a > vector. These would act like Common Lisp's "let": > > (def a 4) > (let {a 1 b a c 3} > (prn a b c)) > > 1 4 3
Can't you already do this with: (let [[a b c] [1 a 3]] (prn a b c)) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---