I like the sequential let too. For one thing, it allows for the breaking apart of complex expressions into more comprehensible parts, with well named intermediate variables resulting in self documenting code. For another, if a calculated value is used more than once, then using an intermediate variable eliminates the code duplication that might otherwise be necessary.
- Keith On Mar 19, 12:21 pm, Stuart Sierra <the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 19, 8:22 am, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > So far it seems like sequential let has proven a useful default, and > > I'd rather have one let than two. > > Agreed - sequential let is a better default. > > -Stuart Sierra --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
