I like the sequential let too.  For one thing, it allows for the
breaking apart of complex expressions into more comprehensible parts,
with well named intermediate variables resulting in self documenting
code.  For another, if a calculated value is used more than once, then
using an intermediate variable eliminates the code duplication that
might otherwise be necessary.

- Keith


On Mar 19, 12:21 pm, Stuart Sierra <the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Mar 19, 8:22 am, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > So far it seems like sequential let has proven a useful default, and  
> > I'd rather have one let than two.
>
> Agreed - sequential let is a better default.
>
> -Stuart Sierra
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to