> > Can't you already do this with: > (let [[a b c] [1 a 3]] > (prn a b c)) > > if, indeed you can, that seems to violate the very interesting, recent discussion Rich initiated that someone recoined as the Property Design Pattern. So, on one hand, having let process args lazily is consistent with the spirit of the language, but on the other hand dealing with two arrays where orders have to line up isn't. Since maps are prefered over pairs of vectors, seems like the map notation is "better"?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
