On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Patrick Gansterer <par...@paroga.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 09:30:58 -0400, David Cole wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Patrick Gansterer <par...@paroga.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 08:08:43 -0400, David Cole wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Do you have a local branch that has all 6 patches one on top of the >>>> other? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Patrick Gansterer <par...@paroga.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 07:44:33 -0400, David Cole wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> What branch did you base these on? >>>>>> >>>>>> They don't apply cleanly on top of master today. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If I made no mistake the basic revision was the master branch of last >>>>> weekend: >>>>> 21b45ce16f88172eac3386f002fe112014053a36 >>>>> >>>>> -- Patrick >>> >>> >>> >>> I pushed it as "ce" to https://gitorious.org/~paroga/cmake/parogas-cmake >>> (git://gitorious.org/~paroga/cmake/parogas-cmake.git) >>> >>> BTW: Are there any plans to use gerrit for CMake too? >>> >>> -- Patrick >> >> >> >> (cc'ing the CMake Developers list back in...) >> >> >> OK, finally got it. Whew. Sometimes I could throw git straight out >> the window... >> >> It merges to 'next' cleanly, and builds ok on my machine with Visual >> Studio 9, but then one test fails... Looks like MSVC71 is somehow >> getting defined for my msvc 9 build: >> ... >> >> I'll continue following up on this on Monday, (looking more closely at >> the changes and trying to fix the failing test if you don't beat me to >> it) -- but for now I have some other deadlines I have to meet. > > > Uuups. Missed to stage the VS71 generator changes. ^^ > > I fixed it and pushed again to the same branch (with --force). > > >> Did you make any progress towards setting up a dashboard for this, >> that demonstrates actually building some WinCE stuff with a toolchain >> file? > > > Is there any good example how to set up a cross compiling environment? > I changed a few files, but didn't find the correct ones until now. It still > compiles for the host system and not for the target system. > If someone can give me a few hints, I can set up the machine in the next few > days. Otherwise I'll need some time to read the code myself, but it's still > on my todo list. :-) > > -- Patrick
I merged this branch into my local 'next' and ran several vs9 and vs10, 32- and 64-bit dashboards on Sunday: http://open.cdash.org/index.php?project=CMake&date=2012-07-22&filtercount=1&showfilters=1&field1=site/string&compare1=63&value1=hut11 As you can see, there are test failures here and there, but I'm not certain if those were problems that would have shown up before trying this branch. I am re-running the dashboards today based strictly on 'next' without those changes for comparison. And while those are running, I'll review the code changes to see if I spot anything objectionable before we merge/push this to origin/next and give it a whirl on the CMake nightly dashboards. Thanks, David -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
