I have a heck of a time upwind with my 38-2 beating those 33’s.  Quick
upwind and point higher.  Downwind we can make some ground up but often
 not  enough to win

On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 3:39 PM Hoyt, Mike via CnC-List <
cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:

> On a rea h a longer waterline boat usually has faster hull speed so would
> pass. If all boats were same design they would have same hull speed and
> woukd not pass on a long reach. On short courses  with short legs even wl
> length makes little difference.
>
> I know the races rob talks about . They usually have legs over a mile long
> so the bigger 35 would certainly be faster downwind and I don't disagree
> that the slightly more modern 33-2 faster upwind
>
> Just my thoughts
>
> Mike
> Persistence
> Halifax
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Robert Abbott via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
> *Sent:* November 13, 2021 10:48:15 AM
> *To:* Stus-List
> *Cc:* Robert Abbott
> *Subject:* Stus-List C&C 33-II vs 35-II
>
> Matthew,
>
> Actually it was not at all impossible...it happened consistently over 5
> races....on the beat, the 33-II would reach the first windward mark before
> the 35-II....the 33 always pointed higher...not much changed on the reach
> but the 35 gained a few boat lengths...then on the run, 35-II would take
> back all the 33-II gained on the beat and then some.  The 35 crossed the
> finish just ahead of the 33
>
> In my opinion, both boats were well crewed/sailed.
>
> What am I saying that is impossible?
>
> Rob Abbott
> AZURA
> C&C 32 - #277
> Halifax, N.S.
>
>
>
> On 2021-09-10 10:33 a.m., Matthew via CnC-List wrote:
>
> That’s interesting.  I keep having issues with my local RC because they
> set only windward/leeward courses, no triangles and no reaches.  The
> reported rationale is that “no one ever passes anybody on a reach.”  What
> you’re saying is impossible.
>
>
>
> *From:* Robert Abbott via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
> <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, September 10, 2021 9:23 AM
> *To:* Stus-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
> *Cc:* Robert Abbott <robertabb...@eastlink.ca> <robertabb...@eastlink.ca>
> *Subject:* Stus-List C&C 33-II vs 35-II
>
>
>
> Some years back when were campaigning a 33-II, we were racing her in the
> Bras d'Or Lakes.....there was 35-II from Shediac, NB with a good crew.  The
> course was a beat, reach and run....every race was the same, the 33-ii
> would get to the first windward mark ahead the 35-II, but once on the reach
> and run, loose it all back.   There was nothing we could do to change it
> after 5 races.
>
> Rob Abbott
> AZURA
> C&C 32 - #277
> Halifax, N.S.
>
>
>
> Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with 
> the costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use 
> PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks - Stu
>
>
> Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with
> the costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use
> PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks
> - Stu
Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with the 
costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use PayPal to 
send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks - Stu

Reply via email to