On 2002-12-17T15:35+0100, éL NìçoS wrote: ) | > | And Coder Com doesn't want you to be able to flood with +x/-x over ) | > | over again. ) | +/-x are a little bit more...chatty, shall we say?
There are situations where one might legitimately want to -x, such as to switch a client over to another host (real host, not IRC hostname), or perhaps restart a client under screen. I imagine -x/+x flooding could be handled in much the same way as nick flooding was handled, have some threshold for floodable changes, then start lagging additional [immediate] ones. -- Daniel Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I don't like sending my conversation hundreds of miles where a lot of people can read it o_0 even if I am just talking about cheese. -- Avatar214, re: encryption in naim naim FAQ: http://128.113.139.111/~n/naim/FAQ