On user-com, we handled this by creating a separate email list where those who reply can work on the standard replies and let the others know that an email was answered.
Aside from the obvious benefits, like no endless repeating threads started by yet another "outside" email on an already discusses topic, it allows for professional, up to date, factual replies being sent from Undernet's coder-com committee.
If anyone wants more info about implementing this here, feel free to email me. I can "show" you the user-com model, but I'm not qualified to reply to questions on this list.
stoney`
At 03:35 PM 12/17/2002 +0100, you wrote:
| > | And Coder Com doesn't want you to be able to flood with +x/-x over and | > | over again. | > | > No one wants to be flooded... Shouldn't we disable changing channel modes | > or topic changes then also? There is a risque we get flooded... | | +/-x are a little bit more...chatty, shall we say?Yes I know,. but other users don't... That's why they ask that question I think :) Do we have a list of frequently asked questions? Just concerning questions like this one, not the technical problems then I mean. Maybe that is a good idea to avoid returning idea's from users subscribing to this list without having seen previous mails? | Kevin L. Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Py Fivestones (stoney` on IRC) [EMAIL PROTECTED] __________________________________________ Undernet user committee response team {[EMAIL PROTECTED]} #userguide - Undernet users helping users http://www.user-com.undernet.org