> There are situations where one might legitimately want to -x, such as to > switch a client over to another host (real host, not IRC hostname), or > perhaps restart a client under screen.
I can't see what you mean in the first, and I don't see how -x is relevant to the second at all. > I imagine -x/+x flooding could be > handled in much the same way as nick flooding was handled, have some > threshold for floodable changes, then start lagging additional [immediate] > ones. of course; makes sense. Of course, it means keeping another timestamp in the struct Client, but... -- Kevin L. Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
