> On 11 Nov 2015, at 22:15, Haohui Mai <ricet...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> bq.  it basically makes the assumption that everyone recompiles for
> every minor release.
> 
> I don't think that the statement holds. HDFS-6200 keeps classes in the
> same package. hdfs-client becomes a transitive dependency of the
> original hdfs jar.
> 
> Applications continue to work without recompilation as the classes
> will be in the same name and will be available in the classpath. They
> have the option of switching to depending only on hdfs-client to
> minimize the dependency when they are comfortable.
> 
> I'm not claiming that there are no bugs in HDFS-6200, but just like
> other features we discover bugs and fix them continuously.
> 
> ~Haohui
> 

currently pulling in hadoop-client gives downstream apps hadoop-hdfs-client, 
but not hadoop-hdfs server side, right?

Reply via email to