> On 11 Nov 2015, at 22:15, Haohui Mai <ricet...@gmail.com> wrote: > > bq. it basically makes the assumption that everyone recompiles for > every minor release. > > I don't think that the statement holds. HDFS-6200 keeps classes in the > same package. hdfs-client becomes a transitive dependency of the > original hdfs jar. > > Applications continue to work without recompilation as the classes > will be in the same name and will be available in the classpath. They > have the option of switching to depending only on hdfs-client to > minimize the dependency when they are comfortable. > > I'm not claiming that there are no bugs in HDFS-6200, but just like > other features we discover bugs and fix them continuously. > > ~Haohui >
currently pulling in hadoop-client gives downstream apps hadoop-hdfs-client, but not hadoop-hdfs server side, right?