bq. currently pulling in hadoop-client gives downstream apps hadoop-hdfs-client, but not hadoop-hdfs server side, right?
Right now hadoop-client pulls in hadoop-hdfs directly to ensure a smooth transition. Maybe we can revisit the decision in the 2.9 / 3.x? On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Steve Loughran <ste...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > >> On 11 Nov 2015, at 22:15, Haohui Mai <ricet...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> bq. it basically makes the assumption that everyone recompiles for >> every minor release. >> >> I don't think that the statement holds. HDFS-6200 keeps classes in the >> same package. hdfs-client becomes a transitive dependency of the >> original hdfs jar. >> >> Applications continue to work without recompilation as the classes >> will be in the same name and will be available in the classpath. They >> have the option of switching to depending only on hdfs-client to >> minimize the dependency when they are comfortable. >> >> I'm not claiming that there are no bugs in HDFS-6200, but just like >> other features we discover bugs and fix them continuously. >> >> ~Haohui >> > > currently pulling in hadoop-client gives downstream apps hadoop-hdfs-client, > but not hadoop-hdfs server side, right?
