I'm +1 to this, as it gets the release out quickly for users, and clears the way for [collections]. Discussion can wait a while.
Stephen PS. There are 'how to do a release' notes on the commons website, although I don't fancy executing them for collections! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rodney Waldhoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > If everyone else is OK with releasing the 1.0 version under > org.apache.commons.collections.primitives (rather than > o.a..commons.primitives), that sounds OK to me. > > If we were to repackage along the type-of-collection lines, we'd likely > be able to deprecate-and-move from o.a.c.primitives as well, but I guess > this way gives us the freedom to choose the new packaging arbitrarily. > > On Sat, 18 Oct 2003, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > > > The reason that this matters is that there are interfaces involved that we > > can't change later. So what might get changed? Well I don't see the need to > > remove anything from the current interfaces. I do believe that there are > > some methods that can be added. (separate email thread). > > Can we execute the 1.0 release before digging too deeply into changes to > the existing structure? > > -- > - Rod <http://radio.weblogs.com/0122027/> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]