Tim, I would be willing to help with commons functor, as I have found it useful in the past and I have familiarity with it.
James -----Original Message----- From: Tim Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 7:31 AM To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' Subject: RE: [all] Together, and bricks apart +1 (can't really say non-binding ;-) Would also like to help revive sandbox functor if I have time. Whats needs to be done to get it this project into commons proper and build a community? Someone else made the point that it would be good to know what needs to be done to make a release. I agree that would useful (wiki?) (I'll take another look). I still think it would be good to have a set of standard functors interfaces. Functor based programming in java is verbose enough without having to wrap implementations. I know people have said these are different but there are in fact quite a few similarities (e.g. composition functions). Tim. -----Original Message----- From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 December 2005 08:40 To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [all] Together, and bricks apart On 12/1/05, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/30/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/30/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On 12/1/05, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Release managers are also facing tougher release checkers now IMHO. For > > > > instance, I haven't ignored configuration, but haven't had the time to > > > > check it out properly (way too much to do). I try to only give a +1 if I > > > > genuinely am happy. Perhaps I'm now applying too high a standard? Its a > > > > tough balance. > > > > > > Adding to what Stephen said, voting +1 to me means at a minimum you're > > > indicating knowledge of the code and/or an intention to support it in > > > some way. For me I can do that on only 3 to 5 of the Commons > > > components. A good example is FileUpload - as a user I would like to > > > see a release, but I only recently looked at a bit of the code and > > > made a minor contribution. When it comes to a vote I'm not sure > > > whether I'll vote for it or not as I don't think I have the time to > > > actually provide any support. Is this the generally accepted criteria > > > or do others follow more or less lenient criteria? > > > > > > I think most people voting +1 are _not_ saying they're prepared to support > > it. Rather, they're saying something more like "I've checked out the > > proposed distribution, and didn't see any issues, so I'm happy for the > > Commons Foo team to release it as is". How much work is behind each +1 I'm > > sure varies from person to person. Some, like Stephen, are putting more > > effort into checking out the builds than they used to, while I'm sure others > > are more lenient. > > > > I hope I'm not wrong on this. If I am, and you're right, Niall, then I might > > as well give up on ever getting another FileUpload release out the door, > > based on how few people other than myself have ever touched the code base > > over the last several years. > > > > -- > For me +1 means pretty much what Martin describes above. I check the > release contents, make sure required elements are there and in jars, > make sure there is nothing funny included. I test the builds, > validate sigs, etc and inspect the web site and, if present, > clirr/jdiff and look carefully at the release notes. I also review > the javadoc, maven reports and POM. I do try to learn a little more > with each release that I review; but at this point I can only provide > support for a handful of commons components personally, so my +1 > really just means I have validated the release and based on what I see > and have seen on the list the release is good to go. > > I have been derelict over the past couple of weeks though, due to this > being a very busy time of year and my trying to get [math] released. > I will review the outstanding candidates ASAP. OK this is good to know - "checking a release" is doable. I think I'd come to the view I had based on the type of thing people put in a vote: [ ] +1 I support this release and am willing to help [ ] +0 I support this release and am unable to help The difference between +1 and +0 here implies some further commitment after the vote. Niall > Phil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
