On 2/2/04 7:43 PM, "Kalnichevski, Oleg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> But can we release 2.0 before we take on too much extra work? :) > > Hi Adrain, > > There's one catch. We wanted the 2.0 release to include a road map outlining > further development plans. We need to provide the users with a coherent > statement as to what features are scheduled for what release. For that end I > wanted to overhaul our issue tracking system first. That's how this whole > Bugzilla story started. We'll have to do some more work upfront, but that will > spare us, I believe, from having to answer all those "when this feature is > due" questions, which will inevitably follow the announcement of the final > release. Fair enough, though I would prefer to see us just formulate a plan to either move or stay rather than actually do it before the 2.0 release. I think that fits better with the package change issues mentioned in other messages. > Oleg Regards, Adrian Sutton. ---------------------------------------------- Intencha "tomorrow's technology today" Ph: 38478913 0422236329 Suite 8/29 Oatland Crescent Holland Park West 4121 Australia QLD www.intencha.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
