@Tom Thanks for the info.  I was asking here and in the other
googlegroups listed as I wanted to see the status. I did say Inoshi
"seems to be dead in the water".  I posted this thread in the Inoshi
Forum 6 days ago and have not received one reply.  In addition, in the
forum in the last 3 months there are no posts of significance:
http://dogfood.insoshi.com/forums/1

You gave me additional insight into looking at the forks. Thanks for
that insight.  To me, this seems that people are taking the platform
and independently developing it. There is little to no community
involvement or communication to share what independent development
there is.

Please correct me if you think I am wrong.  With regards to what you
wrote 2 posts above, activity is good because functionality needs
change and those can be addressed.  I have some DOS programs that are
still stable and functional yet they are very limited in scope.  I
don't know where Inoshi is and I don't have the expertise yet to
assess that.  Tim and Bruno make good points about too many forks and
no active maintainer.

I am very much about building community as I see strength in that.
Let's say Inoshi has some great forks, even ones better than CE or
other platforms, I am am more likely to choose an actively maintained
platform as there is strength in numbers(unless I want to custom code
the whole project/future plugins) and communication of developments.

@Tom
Do you have experience with Inoshi?  How does it compare to CE/
Others?  Which forks do you like best of Inoshi? Why?

Once again, thank you for your feedback.  Looking at forks is very
important.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CommunityEngine" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/communityengine?hl=en.

Reply via email to