Let's make a wild guess. What if I made the web site report approximate strength using the following formula:
dan = (elo - 2300) / 100 So a 2400 player is 1 dan, a 2500 player is 2 dan etc. Here is a table: 2300 - 1.0 kyu 2310 - 0.9 kyu 2320 - 0.8 kyu ... 2400 - 1.0 dan 2410 - 1.1 dan Does this scale and these constants seem reasonable? Am I off a class in either direction? note: this is only to estimate the playing strength relative to a 19x19 player since there is no real system that makes sense for 9x9. I would simple put this on the crosstable web pages in parenthesis. e.g. Rated: 2410 (1.1d est.) - Don Christoph Birk wrote: > Robert Jasiek wrote: >>> Where can one play the latest versions of MoGo or other, similarly >>> strong programs? > > Would it be possible to publish the MonteGNU code? > If yes, then a few dan-players could play each at least 20 games > against it and publish their results. That would allow for a > rough estimate of MonteGNU's strength (9x9 CGOS = 2100 ELO) > and a (first) normalization point for CGOS. > > Christoph > > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/