I don't think that AI is a current worry on the list right now?  I mean, if a 
public set up means that unsavory characters can use AI to access our list and 
do stuff with it that is causing the concern of others, it's all related, I 
feel.   
I actually didn't realize that anything was public *now*.  I thought that I had 
access to archives because I am a member.  Is that not the case?
Perry
    On Wednesday, August 6, 2025 at 10:41:58 AM EDT, Angela DeCarlis 
<[email protected]> wrote:  
 
 @Perry, have we had problems with unsavory characters accessing our list 
as-is? Assuming not, let's not complicate this discussion with less relevant 
concerns! 🙂



On Wed, Aug 6, 2025 at 10:25 AM Perry Shafran via Contra Callers 
<[email protected]> wrote:

 My personal view is that I personally don't care one way or the other - but 
there seems to be enough concern by others to push the list to being private.  
I know that there are many benefits to it being public, but "public" means that 
all sorts of unsavory characters can access and do whatever with it, and that's 
enough for me to keep it private.  There's no financial cost whatsoever to 
membership, so anyone who wants the info should be approved before they get 
access.  
I'm sure there are benefits to having a public list, but I think those benefits 
are maintained if you make it private and have people join the group.  
Perry Shafran
    On Wednesday, August 6, 2025 at 10:12:01 AM EDT, Maia McCormick via Contra 
Callers <[email protected]> wrote:  
 
 Just my two cents, not an opinion that's necessarily strong enough to sway us 
one way or the other but figured I'd share:
I really don’t feel excited about feeding the giant capitalist dystopia 
plagiarism machine. I don't see "improving the capability of LLMS" as an 
obvious good. I think that LLMs are good for a ton of things, but the current 
hype is overblown and dangerous and I'm just hoping the current bubble pops 
before it does more damage.

I agree that if you exist on the Internet these days, it's pretty hard to avoid 
having your content fed to LLMs; and I think the benefit of having the listserv 
be public to nonmembers may very well outweigh the costs of feeding the giant 
capitalist dystopia plagiarism machine. However, I will be pretty grumpy if we 
decide that feeding the plagiarism machine is the express reason WHY we are 
leaving the listserv public.--Maia McCormick (she/her)917.279.8194

On Wed, Aug 6, 2025 at 5:22 AM Mo Waddington via Contra Callers 
<[email protected]> wrote:

  
Some of us are UK based, so members of EFDSS not CDSS
 

 
 On 05/08/2025 22:29, Sivier, Jonathan E via Contra Callers wrote:
  
  There are 2 different elements of a group that can be made private.  There is 
the archive of past messages and then there is the group itself.  I would 
suggest that even if the archives are made private, so that only group members 
can access them, that the groups should still be listed in the Groups.io 
directory.  That would mean that people looking for dance related groups could 
find them and apply to join.  Of course, if the intention is that only CDSS 
members can join the groups then I suppose they shouldn't be listed in the 
directory and links to the groups could be available in CDSS Commons where CDSS 
members can log in and then apply to join one or more lists.  
   Jonathan  
   
     From: Sivier, Jonathan E <[email protected]>
 Sent: Tuesday, August 5, 2025 3:42 PM
 To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
 Subject: Re: [Callers] Re: List archives     
   If you are a member of the group, and logged in, the numbers under the 
months are links to the archive.  
   Jonathan  
     From: Keith Elmo Eldridge via Contra Callers 
<[email protected]>
 Sent: Tuesday, August 5, 2025 3:35 PM
 To: 'barbara153' <[email protected]>; 'Michael Fuerst via Contra Callers' 
<[email protected]>
 Subject: [Callers] Re: List archives    Barbara wrote:
         > How would I access these lists if you change to private?
 
 I  moved a number of genealogical Mailing Lists from RootsWeb to Groups.io in 
2020.  The archives for them are not private and they at listed by month at the 
bottom of the page for each Group.  E.g. for my Essex-UK Group go to: 
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://groups.io/g/Essex-UK__;!!DZ3fjg!9gV8o9q6jEA1a6Er2YCQnai2kNjSMwFB65l8lSysasHxZnxWAwmAwH2cSfWqNeEG4wSDNCwz82fqN8Cg8LZa6z_yfaMrrI9N15Iu$
 When the archives for a Group are private the message per month are shown, but 
there are no links, just a number. E.g. 
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://groups.io/g/Podger__;!!DZ3fjg!9gV8o9q6jEA1a6Er2YCQnai2kNjSMwFB65l8lSysasHxZnxWAwmAwH2cSfWqNeEG4wSDNCwz82fqN8Cg8LZa6z_yfaMrrI3g-yj8$
 
 Cheers
         Elmo
 --
 --Keith Elmo Eldridge
 [email protected]
 --Sheffield, England
 --I am therefore I dance. I dance therefore I am.
 
 _______________________________________________
 Contra Callers mailing list -- [email protected]
 To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] 
  _______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
 
 _______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
  _______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

  
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to