On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 02:05:53PM +0200, Steffen Barszus wrote: > On Tuesday 01 April 2003 13:22, Murray J. Root wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 02:45:00AM -0800, James Sparenberg wrote: > > > On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 18:38, Leon Brooks wrote: > > > > On Monday 31 March 2003 05:49, Toran Korshnah wrote: > > > > > I read the 9.2 thread and I begin to wonder if 9.1 is a good release. > > > > > Are there really so many bugs? > > > > > > > > Not so far. Most of the people reporting on my LUG list are delighted > > > > with it. Specifically, a few of them are crowing about stuff that was > > > > broken in earlier Mandrakes but works out of the box now. > > > > > > > > Cheers; Leon > > > > > > Agreed... 9.1 is a move forward.. but If I read everyone right the > > > attitude is... We did this much... but we can do more. > > > > From #mandrake on irc.freenode.net it looks like the big 9.1 support issue > > is going to be the installer. It doesn't seem to work well with SMP or > > users like me who want to jump back and fix things cause we forgot which > > box we were installing. > > text install seems to work for the SMP people. Us "oops - I goofed" people > > seem to be out of luck. > > Why ? you have this nice "Summary" at the end there you can double and triple > check that you haven't forgot anything ;) > I think it bothers me cause I like to go back and fix it as soon as I realize I goofed, but if most people prefer not to have options I guess I can live with the gnomification [removal of user options] - I use cooker for most my boxes anyway.
-- Murray J. Root
