>>>>> "danny" == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
danny> On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Austin wrote: >> >> On 08/20/03 03:57:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Austin wrote: >> > >> > > >> > > So a few comments: >> > > 1. Kernel 2.6 alsa backport sucks. Hard. >> > It can also be due to one of the other ALSA patches inside mdk kernel. Can >> > you just disable those and try, and do a diff on the rest to see what is >> > different? >> >> It sounds like that might be the problem. >> I'm not 100% sure what you want me to do though. >> Disable extraneous alsa patches in kernel spec, rebuild a new kernel and test danny> not sure if that is possible, you can only give the start patch number to danny> the apply_patches script. But you can just remove them from the patches danny> tarbal (it is in your SOURCES dir, IIRC danny> linux-<version>q<version>.tar.bz2) You can always try: apply_patches --stop=ms01 apply_patches --start=za01-6 to skip all alsa patches. Notice that alsa patches that we have are basically the only the ones in alsa-0.9.6, or completely new aditions, i.e. basically no patches to alsa code at all (just that their Makefiles/Config.in sucks big time). danny> and then rebuild the kernel (check the patches you remove, some danny> might be required to let it build properly). >> it. I think I can do that. >> But then diff what? danny> o..I meant, if it still doesn't work, diff the unpacked alsa tarbal (it is danny> also in the patches file) against your danny> functional alsa download, to be sure there are no differences. Yupp, and you can send me the diff to update it. But first, please, test 2.4.22.0.7mdk, as I fixed a typo in request module on our alsa patches. Later, Juan. -- In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they are different -- Larry McVoy
