On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Tom Vogt wrote: > two different explanations. how can we find out which one is closer to > the truth? What truth? What makes you think there couldn't be even more factors like religous, economic, or raw resource issues as well. Quit looking for easy answers. > and again there's the question of whether an ideal should be followed if > it is proven to be so volatile. Not sure what you mean by volatile in this context. All ideas are volatile. ____________________________________________________________________ The future is downloading. Can you hear the impact? O[rphan] D[rift>] Cyber Positive The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: damn commie hypocrite leech! ... Sunder
- Re: damn commie hypocrite lee... mgraffam
- Re: damn commie hypocrite... Sunder
- Re: damn commie hypocrite... mgraffam
- Re: damn commie hypocrite... Jim Choate
- Re: damn commie hypocrite leech! (was Re: ... Jim Burnes
- Re: damn commie hypocrite leech! (was... Missouri FreeNet Administration
- Re: damn commie hypocrite leech! ... Tom Vogt
- Political realities (was &quo... Jim Choate
- Re: Political realities (... Tom Vogt
- Re: Political realities (... Jim Choate
- Re: Political realities (... Tom Vogt
- Re: Political realities (... Jim Choate
- Re: Political realities (... Tom Vogt
- Re: Political realities (... Jim Choate
- Re: Political realities (... Tom Vogt
- Re: Political realities (... Jim Choate
- Re: Political realities (... Tom Vogt
- Re: damn commie hypocrite lee... mgraffam
- Re: Re: damn commie hypoc... Tom Vogt
- Re: Re: damn commie hypoc... mgraffam