On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Ondrej Certik <ond...@certik.cz> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Robert Bradshaw > <rober...@math.washington.edu> wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:14 PM, Stefan Behnel <stefan...@behnel.de> wrote: >>> Stefan Behnel, 16.11.2010 12:46: >>>> when I try to hg push to cython-devel, I keep getting this: >>>> >>>> """ >>>> Traceback (most recent call last): >>>> SyntaxError: Error expanding 'sessionvars%urlparameter' >>>> """ >>>> >>>> Trac seems to be broken, too. Has anything changed on the Cython VM since >>>> yesterday that could trigger this? >>> >>> hg is back to normal since William cleaned up the disk space. trac is still >>> down, it seems. >>> >>> Robert, since you set up most of the infrastructure (IIRC), could you take >>> an attempt at the migration to boxen? >> >> So, I've been thinking about this, and one of the reasons we're using >> the current setup is that it requires very little administration from >> me, as I am essentially leaching of the sagemath.org infrastructure. >> Moving things to boxen would be a bit more administration on our part, >> but still not too bad, and I know William is a happy enough Cython >> user to be fine with continuing to host us :). However, I'm wondering >> if this would be a ripe occasion to making the leap to something like >> http://code.google.com. Currently, our infrastructure consists of >> >> 1. The web site >> 2. Trac >> 3. Wiki >> 4. Repositories >> 5. Buildbot >> 6. Mailing lists >> >> Currently we're hosting 1-5, and 6 is being hosted by codespeak.net >> (for cython-dev) and google (for cython-users). I think it may be >> worth considering moving 2-4 elsewhere, as there is little loss and >> they are the higher-maintenance (from an administrative point of view) >> items, and features such as code review tools would be nice to have as >> well. Trying to use launchpad was painful, so this decision shouldn't >> be taken lightly, but I think we can do better. Of course >> code.google.com isn't the only option, but even trying to be unbiased >> about it I think it's a very good option, and >> http://www.dataliberation.org/google/code-project-hosting factors into >> it as well. >> >> In terms of the website itself, I think we should keep hosting that >> (for maximum flexibility, and it's easy to administer), and there >> isn't much of an option for 5 (though steps should be taken to reduce >> its load). > > Robert has asked me to reply what I think about google code and > github, since sympy has used google code since the beginning, e.g. > last couple years, so I wrote this blog post about comparing Google > Code and GitHub: > > http://ondrejcertik.blogspot.com/2010/11/google-code-vs-github-for-hosting.html
Thanks! To clarify, you never used google's distributed module of push and pull requests? (hg, not git) Granted, I think github (and perhaps because of git) gets this done smoother. What are the chances they'll fix their issue tracker? :( - Robert _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list Cython-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
