On Friday 20 Jun 2003 11:38 pm, Dave Rolsky wrote: > On Sat, 21 Jun 2003, Richard Evans wrote: > > The conversion script is a horrible mess - it's part of the other locale > > stuff I was (maybe still am) doing, and uses 10 other modules that are in > > a state of flux ATM. I also have a horrible feeling the ICU .xml file > > format had changed last time I looked at the CVS code. > > > > Based off the glacial response I've got from the openI18N guys - "yeah, > > that looks wrong, we'll fix it" - now one and a half months later and no > > change yet - my gut feeling is that the Locale data should go into CVS as > > it is now. > > > > Corrections and additions would then go directly into the DT::Locale CVS > > rather than waiting weeks for fixes to get put into the ICU locales. > > > > But I'm guessing that's not what you have in mind - do you want the > > DT::Locale code as it stands to go in, or are you only really interested > > in the conversion script? If it's the latter, I'll try to get it into a > > maintainable state, but that will take a while longer, no question about > > that! > > We can't put the generated code in CVS without the generator. We need to > be able to make changes in stuff like Locale.pm without having to email > you and ask you to do it.
Sorry, I don't get what you mean. I'm suggesting I donate all the DT::Locale code to the DT project next week, then anyone with CVS access can hack away to their hearts content - I wouldn't be in "control" of it any more. If you want to give me CVS access as well, that's entirely up to you, but I would be happy to concentrate on other things for a while. Does that make sense, or am I missing the point? (wouldn't be the first time :) Cheers, -- Rich [EMAIL PROTECTED]