On Sat, 21 Jun 2003, Richard Evans wrote: > On Saturday 21 Jun 2003 4:16 am, Dave Rolsky wrote: > > On Sat, 21 Jun 2003, Richard Evans wrote: > > > The one exception to this would be additions, and in that case I can > > > generate any new locales for the time being - I'm not saying that I'll > > > never release the generator code, simply that it's not feasible in the > > > short term. > > > > Why isn't it feasible? Just release it and I'll clean it up if necessary. > > > > I'm not willing to check in generated code without having the generator > > available, though. If you're really not willing to release yours, I'll > > just write one from scratch that generates the same output. > > Well ok, if that's your attitude go ahead - I won't bother you again.
I think it's your attitude that's a bit odd. You want a free software project to use code generated from non-free software. I don't like that practically or ideologically. Honestly, if I had understood from the beginning that you weren't interested in sharing the generator code I would have suggested that you not work on it for the DateTime project, for this exact reason. I do appreciate the work you've put in so far, and it'll still be useful in writing a new generator, because doing it from scratch would be much harder. -davge /*======================= House Absolute Consulting www.houseabsolute.com =======================*/
