On Tue 25 Jun 2024 at 18:46:26 (+1000), Keith Bainbridge wrote: > On 23/6/24 00:52, David Wright wrote: > > > Excellent. Now how do we get our MUA to do that when replying to mail, > > > which is where I saw what I thought was a system error - but in fact > > > was a misinterpretation. > > I don't see the point. The email has a "Date:" header. > > Sounds like I'm the only one who mis-read the date format when I > raised the query originally. > > Is David writing at 00:52 or is that time UTC?
Why are you asking that? You're the person who caused the string: "On 23/6/24 00:52, David Wright wrote" to be entered into this thread. If you want to know when I wrote that post, then look at its Date: header. I can't say it any clearer than that. It's here; look, I'll quote it: ✄✄✄✄✄✄✄✄✄✄✄✄✄✄✄✄✄✄✄✄ Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 09:52:08 -0500 ←---------- here! From: David Wright <deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk> Subject: Re: Maximum size .bash_aliases file X-Original-To: deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk X-Original-To: lists-debian-u...@bendel.debian.org Reply-To: debian-user@lists.debian.org On Sat 22 Jun 2024 at 18:35:34 (+1000), Keith Bainbridge wrote: > On 21/6/24 14:28, David Wright wrote: > > You could pronounce your time written above as: > > > > "It's Thu 20Jun2024 at 20:51:19 here, where clocks are UTC+10:00" > > Excellent. Now how do we get our MUA to do that when replying to mail, > which is where I saw what I thought was a system error - but in fact > was a misinterpretation. ✄✄✄✄✄✄✄✄✄✄✄✄✄✄✄✄✄✄✄✄ That's as I see it. And on the web, attached. Cheers, David.
