Greg Stein wrote: > > > > Regarding specifically e-k, as a html parser, it's > > got more a family tie, IMO, to the HTTP server project, than APR. > > I think it fits in better among libapreq than in the APR world, > > mostly because it's focused towards the web server and web server > > functionality. > > Eh? I see this as mostly a client library. I'm thinking screen scraping, or > the core of an HTML renderer, or something similar. Yes, it *also* has some > neat server capabilities (filter-based processing). >
I was thinking mostly along the lines that under the "web server project" there exists the HTTP specific entities, and a HTML parser would fall into there. But yeah, it could also fit in APR too. But it's not going to ruffle my feathers either way. :) -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
