Anyone have any serious objections to releasing HEAD of apr/apr-util
as 0.9.2? Does anyone want to volunteer to be RM? (Should be
painless, but I really have other stuff to do...)
I think we have the release showstoppers in apr-util resolved now (in
that it can build by itself). APR has mostly pie-in-the-sky
showstoppers... -- justin
- Re: Release 0.9.2 of apr/apr-util? Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: Release 0.9.2 of apr/apr-util? Garrett Rooney
- Re: Release 0.9.2 of apr/apr-util? William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: Release 0.9.2 of apr/apr-util? Garrett Rooney
- Re: Release 0.9.2 of apr/apr-util? Greg Stein
- Re: Release 0.9.2 of apr/apr-ut... Garrett Rooney
- Re: Release 0.9.2 of apr/ap... Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: Release 0.9.2 of ap... Garrett Rooney
- Re: Release 0.9.2 of ap... Jeff Trawick
- Re: Release 0.9.2 of ap... Garrett Rooney
- Re: Release 0.9.2 of ap... Craig Rodrigues