William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
So my personal desire would be to release 2.0.45, with its bugfixes
based on APR 0.9.2 (release). Would anyone object to that symytry?
this seems reasonable to me. i like the idea of apache picking up an actual release of apr, as opposed to effectively rolling it's own by shipping a snapshot of what's in CVS.
The only other 'little thing' I want to do is bring in Allen Edward's
suggestions for debugging symbols for win32 release builds, so
those of us bug hunting can track down pesky segfaults and other
odd behavior from Win32 core dumps. It's a trivial patch, I'm just trying to figure out how we can also get WinNT .dbg symbol files out of the deal without too much pain.
in that case, why don't we wait for this change, then roll 0.9.2? now that the issues with the configure scripts that kept us from building from a released tarball have been resolved, i'd like to see apr making releases more often, so client apps (apache, subversion, etc) can simply use those rather than pulling something out of cvs.
-garrett
