FWIW... head is broken for apr/time/win32/time.c ... and the patch is forthcoming.
My thinking is that a couple thousand users are just getting their first look at our latest APR, via HTTPD 2.0.44, and they are finding a couple of bugs. We also might want to get more platforms recorded from the test suite... I'll start a STATUS entry for testall exceptions. I'm going to RM an HTTPD 2.0.45 maintenance release next week, based on fixing those bugs (and a few other old ones that anyone cares to pick up and fix.) So my personal desire would be to release 2.0.45, with its bugfixes based on APR 0.9.2 (release). Would anyone object to that symytry? The only other 'little thing' I want to do is bring in Allen Edward's suggestions for debugging symbols for win32 release builds, so those of us bug hunting can track down pesky segfaults and other odd behavior from Win32 core dumps. It's a trivial patch, I'm just trying to figure out how we can also get WinNT .dbg symbol files out of the deal without too much pain. Bill At 12:05 PM 1/22/2003, Garrett Rooney wrote: >Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > >>Anyone have any serious objections to releasing HEAD of apr/apr-util as >>0.9.2? Does anyone want to volunteer to be RM? (Should be painless, but I >>really have other stuff to do...) >> >>I think we have the release showstoppers in apr-util resolved now (in that it >>can build by itself). APR has mostly pie-in-the-sky showstoppers... -- >>justin > > >+1, cut the next release soon. > >-garrett
