Justin Erenkrantz wrote:

Anyone have any serious objections to releasing HEAD of apr/apr-util as 0.9.2? Does anyone want to volunteer to be RM? (Should be painless, but I really have other stuff to do...)

I think we have the release showstoppers in apr-util resolved now (in that it can build by itself). APR has mostly pie-in-the-sky showstoppers... -- justin


+1, cut the next release soon.

-garrett



Reply via email to