+1 nice and clean On Apr 30, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Michael Brooks <mich...@michaelbrooks.ca> wrote:
> +1 cordova.js with version as a header comment > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> If I recall correctly the original reason was because putting the version >> in after the lib name in the JS filename was what "other libraries did" >> aka jQuery. >> >> +1 from me. >> >> On 4/30/13 11:24 AM, "tommy-carlos Williams" <to...@devgeeks.org> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Wouldn't this make mobile spec easier too? >>> >>> On 01/05/2013, at 4:20, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> wrote: >>> >>>> This has been brought up a few times, but I'm not sure there's been a >>>> decisive answer here yet... >>>> >>>> iOS now uses "cordova.ios.js" >>>> Android uses "cordova.android.js", but renames it in a build step to >>>> add in >>>> the version number. >>>> CLI normalizes to "cordova.js" >>>> >>>> The version number is now stamped at the top of the file in a code >>>> comment, >>>> and I feel that having it in the file name just makes work for us and >>>> our >>>> users. I'd like to change all repos to just use "cordova.js". >>>> >>>> Any objections? >>>> >>>> Andrew >> >>
