+1 for sure....

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Anis KADRI <anis.ka...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1!
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Jesse <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > @purplecabbage
> > risingj.com
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:54 PM, James Jong <wjamesj...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 Cleaner.  Thanks Andrew!
> > > >
> > > > -James Jong
> > > >
> > > > On Apr 30, 2013, at 3:31 PM, Lorin Beer <lorin.beer....@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > > duplicated information is a good redundancy to remove
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Sounds good. FTR we did it for issue tracking not arbitrarily.
> > Having
> > > > >> a stamp at the top of the file fulfills the same end.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >>> If I recall correctly the original reason was because putting the
> > > > version
> > > > >>> in after the lib name in the JS filename was what "other
> libraries
> > > did"
> > > > >>> aka jQuery.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> +1 from me.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On 4/30/13 11:24 AM, "tommy-carlos Williams" <to...@devgeeks.org
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> +1
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Wouldn't this make mobile spec easier too?
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> On 01/05/2013, at 4:20, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>> This has been brought up a few times, but I'm not sure there's
> > > been a
> > > > >>>>> decisive answer here yet...
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> iOS now uses "cordova.ios.js"
> > > > >>>>> Android uses "cordova.android.js", but renames it in a build
> step
> > > to
> > > > >>>>> add in
> > > > >>>>> the version number.
> > > > >>>>> CLI normalizes to "cordova.js"
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> The version number is now stamped at the top of the file in a
> > code
> > > > >>>>> comment,
> > > > >>>>> and I feel that having it in the file name just makes work for
> us
> > > and
> > > > >>>>> our
> > > > >>>>> users. I'd like to change all repos to just use "cordova.js".
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Any objections?
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Andrew
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to