+1. We moved away from that in WebWorks a while back and just had the packaging 
tool copy in the compatible version.

Sent from my BlackBerry Z10 smartphone on the Bell network.
From: Michael Brooks
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 1:36 PM
To: [email protected]
Reply To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Naming: cordova-2.8.0.js --> cordova.js


+1 cordova.js with version as a header comment


On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote:

> If I recall correctly the original reason was because putting the version
> in after the lib name in the JS filename was what "other libraries did"
> aka jQuery.
>
> +1 from me.
>
> On 4/30/13 11:24 AM, "tommy-carlos Williams" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >+1
> >
> >Wouldn't this make mobile spec easier too?
> >
> >On 01/05/2013, at 4:20, Andrew Grieve <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> This has been brought up a few times, but I'm not sure there's been a
> >> decisive answer here yet...
> >>
> >> iOS now uses "cordova.ios.js"
> >> Android uses "cordova.android.js", but renames it in a build step to
> >>add in
> >> the version number.
> >> CLI normalizes to "cordova.js"
> >>
> >> The version number is now stamped at the top of the file in a code
> >>comment,
> >> and I feel that having it in the file name just makes work for us and
> >>our
> >> users. I'd like to change all repos to just use "cordova.js".
> >>
> >> Any objections?
> >>
> >> Andrew
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential 
information, privileged material (including material protected by the 
solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public 
information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended 
recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, 
please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your 
system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission 
by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.

Reply via email to