+1
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:54 PM, James Jong <wjamesj...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 Cleaner. Thanks Andrew! > > -James Jong > > On Apr 30, 2013, at 3:31 PM, Lorin Beer <lorin.beer....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > duplicated information is a good redundancy to remove > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > > > >> Sounds good. FTR we did it for issue tracking not arbitrarily. Having > >> a stamp at the top of the file fulfills the same end. > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: > >>> If I recall correctly the original reason was because putting the > version > >>> in after the lib name in the JS filename was what "other libraries did" > >>> aka jQuery. > >>> > >>> +1 from me. > >>> > >>> On 4/30/13 11:24 AM, "tommy-carlos Williams" <to...@devgeeks.org> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> +1 > >>>> > >>>> Wouldn't this make mobile spec easier too? > >>>> > >>>> On 01/05/2013, at 4:20, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> This has been brought up a few times, but I'm not sure there's been a > >>>>> decisive answer here yet... > >>>>> > >>>>> iOS now uses "cordova.ios.js" > >>>>> Android uses "cordova.android.js", but renames it in a build step to > >>>>> add in > >>>>> the version number. > >>>>> CLI normalizes to "cordova.js" > >>>>> > >>>>> The version number is now stamped at the top of the file in a code > >>>>> comment, > >>>>> and I feel that having it in the file name just makes work for us and > >>>>> our > >>>>> users. I'd like to change all repos to just use "cordova.js". > >>>>> > >>>>> Any objections? > >>>>> > >>>>> Andrew > >>> > >> > >
