Great! I'll make it happen :) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3307
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > Sounds good. FTR we did it for issue tracking not arbitrarily. Having > a stamp at the top of the file fulfills the same end. > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: > > If I recall correctly the original reason was because putting the version > > in after the lib name in the JS filename was what "other libraries did" > > aka jQuery. > > > > +1 from me. > > > > On 4/30/13 11:24 AM, "tommy-carlos Williams" <to...@devgeeks.org> wrote: > > > >>+1 > >> > >>Wouldn't this make mobile spec easier too? > >> > >>On 01/05/2013, at 4:20, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> > >>> This has been brought up a few times, but I'm not sure there's been a > >>> decisive answer here yet... > >>> > >>> iOS now uses "cordova.ios.js" > >>> Android uses "cordova.android.js", but renames it in a build step to > >>>add in > >>> the version number. > >>> CLI normalizes to "cordova.js" > >>> > >>> The version number is now stamped at the top of the file in a code > >>>comment, > >>> and I feel that having it in the file name just makes work for us and > >>>our > >>> users. I'd like to change all repos to just use "cordova.js". > >>> > >>> Any objections? > >>> > >>> Andrew > > >
