+1 @purplecabbage risingj.com
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:54 PM, James Jong <wjamesj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 Cleaner. Thanks Andrew! > > > > -James Jong > > > > On Apr 30, 2013, at 3:31 PM, Lorin Beer <lorin.beer....@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > duplicated information is a good redundancy to remove > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > > > > > >> Sounds good. FTR we did it for issue tracking not arbitrarily. Having > > >> a stamp at the top of the file fulfills the same end. > > >> > > >> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: > > >>> If I recall correctly the original reason was because putting the > > version > > >>> in after the lib name in the JS filename was what "other libraries > did" > > >>> aka jQuery. > > >>> > > >>> +1 from me. > > >>> > > >>> On 4/30/13 11:24 AM, "tommy-carlos Williams" <to...@devgeeks.org> > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> +1 > > >>>> > > >>>> Wouldn't this make mobile spec easier too? > > >>>> > > >>>> On 01/05/2013, at 4:20, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> This has been brought up a few times, but I'm not sure there's > been a > > >>>>> decisive answer here yet... > > >>>>> > > >>>>> iOS now uses "cordova.ios.js" > > >>>>> Android uses "cordova.android.js", but renames it in a build step > to > > >>>>> add in > > >>>>> the version number. > > >>>>> CLI normalizes to "cordova.js" > > >>>>> > > >>>>> The version number is now stamped at the top of the file in a code > > >>>>> comment, > > >>>>> and I feel that having it in the file name just makes work for us > and > > >>>>> our > > >>>>> users. I'd like to change all repos to just use "cordova.js". > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Any objections? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Andrew > > >>> > > >> > > > > >
