Hangout would be a good idea. 

FYI, I will be off next week. How about the week after next? If it works, 
please feel free to schedule one and count me in.

Thanks,
-ningxin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mmo...@google.com [mailto:mmo...@google.com] On Behalf Of Michal
> Mocny
> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 11:39 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines
> 
> Would it be alright to set up a Hangout some time to introduce everyone?
> 
> Joe has been leading the effort here, but there are other cordova contributors
> for whom this is top priority.  It would be nice if we could all meet to say 
> hello
> and make sure we are all going in the right direction.
> 
> Quite exciting!
> 
> -Michal
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Hu, Ningxin <ningxin...@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > Joe, thanks for this. I am very excited.
> >
> > FYI. Crosswalk team is working on refactoring the WebView API to
> > support embedding usage better [1]. (Previously the layer API was not
> > exposed as public usage).
> >
> > I would like to review the PoC and work with you to get Crosswalk fits
> > into the pluggable WebView architecture.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -ningxin
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bows...@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 7:08 AM
> > > To: dev
> > > Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines
> > >
> > > Hey
> > >
> > > After debugging, I did some minor updates to the plugin README.  It
> > should be
> > > easier to get this up and running, although there's still the issue
> > > of
> > after-install
> > > hooks and the relative path weirdness with the Crosswalk Library itself.
> > >
> > > It still doesn't support the CLI at all, but it should be there with
> > > the
> > old flow.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > (Sorry Joe, Googlers are down in California and way busy.  Will be
> > > > back in a week.  Super excited about this, though.)
> > > >
> > > > -Michal
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Reviving this thread!
> > > >>
> > > >> Can other people look at this, and see if/when we should land this?
> > > >> I know that I have to re-write the tests still, but I would like
> > > >> some feedback before merging it in.  Also, it'd be super awesome
> > > >> if other people could try and make a WebView based on the
> > > >> interfaces and recommend which methods should die.  I want to get
> > > >> this released in the next month or so, so any time and feedback
> > > >> would be greatly appreciated.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >> > Hey, I created the following today to track various WebView
> > progresses:
> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-6246
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I also have this repo created.  The licensing is ugly as all
> > > >> > crap, but it's a Proof-Of-Concept:
> > > >> > https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-crosswalk-engine
> > > >> >
> > > >> > If I can get some help getting plugman to just load Crosswalk,
> > > >> > it'll
> > > >> look hawt.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > BTW: We should probably get this ready to go into Android in
> > > >> > the next two months and deprecate the setProperty methods,
> > > >> > since all properties should be preferences in config.xml now.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >> >> Perhaps. There would be additional benefits to this approach,
> > > >> >> namely fixes being added to that platform more quickly.  I'll
> > > >> >> probably take a look at that once I have Crosswalk finalized.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> > > >> >>> this is great stuff
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> do we think it may be possible to bring in amazon fireos
> > > >> >>> stuff
> > > >> eventually
> > > >> >>> too?
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Joe Bowser
> > > >> >>> <bows...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>>> BTW: I committed it in my repo, not the main Apache one.
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Joe Bowser
> > > >> >>>> <bows...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >> >>>> > Hey
> > > >> >>>> >
> > > >> >>>> > I just committed some code based on their WebView
> > > >> >>>> > modifications that allows you to choose your renderer in
> > > >> >>>> > the
> > config file
> > > with this:
> > > >> >>>> >
> > > >> >>>> >     <preference name="webView"
> > > >> >>>> > value="org.apache.cordova.engine.crosswalk.XWalkCordovaWeb
> > > >> >>>> > View
> > > >> >>>> > " />
> > > >> >>>> >
> > > >> >>>> > You currently have to copy over the *.pak file and the
> > > >> >>>> > jsapi from a Crosswalk Example project to get this to
> > > >> >>>> > work.  The next thing that I'm going to do is figure out
> > > >> >>>> > how to write this as a plugin and have it install on a default 
> > > >> >>>> > project.
> > > >> >>>> > Also, right now the bridge doesn't seem to work, and I
> > > >> >>>> > don't know why exactly.  That being said, the
> > > >> fact
> > > >> >>>> > that I can choose which version of Chrome/Chromium I'm
> > > >> >>>> > running with
> > > >> a
> > > >> >>>> > single XML preference is HUGE.
> > > >> >>>> >
> > > >> >>>> > There's definitely a lot more work that needs to be done,
> > > >> >>>> > but as
> > > >> long
> > > >> >>>> > as we have something that we can fit into the interface,
> > > >> >>>> > we should
> > > >> be
> > > >> >>>> > able to put in things like GeckoView or other third party
> > renderers.
> > > >> >>>> > The nightmare of being stuck with bullshit WebView bugs
> > > >> >>>> > may soon be over.
> > > >> >>>> >
> > > >> >>>> > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Michal Mocny
> > > >> >>>> > <mmo...@chromium.org>
> > > >> >>>> wrote:
> > > >> >>>> >> https://github.com/crosswalk-project/crosswalk-cordova-an
> > > >> >>>> >> droi
> > > >> >>>> >> d
> > > >> >>>> >>
> > > >> >>>> >> First patch they landed, which claims to have min viable
> > > >> >>>> >> xwalk
> > > >> webview:
> > > >> >>>> >>
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> https://github.com/crosswalk-project/crosswalk-cordova-android/co
> > > >> mmit
> > > >> /a04dedeb0204e7542d190312c6ae70c795a26e04
> > > >> >>>> >>
> > > >> >>>> >>
> > > >> >>>> >> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Michal Mocny
> > > >> >>>> >> <mmo...@chromium.org
> > > >> >
> > > >> >>>> wrote:
> > > >> >>>> >>
> > > >> >>>> >>> I haven't looked yet, but did you see:
> > > >> >>>> >>> https://crosswalk-project.org/#wiki/crosswalk-cordova-an
> > > >> >>>> >>> droi
> > > >> >>>> >>> d
> > > >> >>>> >>>
> > > >> >>>> >>> ?
> > > >> >>>> >>>
> > > >> >>>> >>>
> > > >> >>>> >>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Andrew Grieve <
> > > >> agri...@chromium.org
> > > >> >>>> >wrote:
> > > >> >>>> >>>
> > > >> >>>> >>>> First - very excited that you're working on this!
> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> >>>> Had a quick look. Not sure there's much to be gleaned yet.
> > > >> >>>> >>>> Once
> > > >> you
> > > >> >>>> start
> > > >> >>>> >>>> in on hooking up x-walk's webview I think it will
> > > >> >>>> >>>> become more
> > > >> obvious
> > > >> >>>> what
> > > >> >>>> >>>> the interface should look like. E.g., does x-walk even
> > > >> >>>> >>>> have the
> > > >> >>>> concept of
> > > >> >>>> >>>> ChromeClient vs WebViewClient vs WebView? Also unsure
> > > >> >>>> >>>> whether the
> > > >> >>>> class
> > > >> >>>> >>>> should extend android.View as well as implement our
> > interface.
> > > >> E.g.
> > > >> >>>> >>>> alternative is to have a "getView()" method on the
> > interface.
> > > >> Might
> > > >> >>>> help
> > > >> >>>> >>>> to
> > > >> >>>> >>>> cut down on file sizes, and API surface, but again, I'm
> > > >> >>>> >>>> not too
> > > >> sure.
> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> >>>> I've been pretty hesitant to touch existing exposed
> > > >> >>>> >>>> members
> > > >> (e.g. the
> > > >> >>>> >>>> public fields you were referring to) since touching
> > > >> >>>> >>>> anything
> > > >> public
> > > >> >>>> could
> > > >> >>>> >>>> break plugins. That said, maybe now is a good time to
> > > >> >>>> >>>> @deprecate
> > > >> a
> > > >> >>>> bunch
> > > >> >>>> >>>> of
> > > >> >>>> >>>> them and either replace them with getters, or just
> > > >> >>>> >>>> declare them
> > > >> to be
> > > >> >>>> not
> > > >> >>>> >>>> exposed to plugins.
> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Joe Bowser
> > > >> >>>> >>>> <bows...@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> >>>> > So, after looking at the Crosswalk code again, I've
> > > >> >>>> >>>> > decided to
> > > >> take
> > > >> >>>> a
> > > >> >>>> >>>> > quick stab at making things pluggable.  I don't have
> > > >> >>>> >>>> > a lot to
> > > >> show
> > > >> >>>> for
> > > >> >>>> >>>> > it, but with the help of Eclipse (which is why the
> > > >> >>>> >>>> > generated interfaces look so screwed up), I managed
> > > >> >>>> >>>> > to create some
> > > >> interfaces
> > > >> >>>> so
> > > >> >>>> >>>> > we can start shoehorning in other browser renderers.
> > > >> >>>> >>>> >
> > > >> >>>> >>>> >
> > > >> https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-android/tree/pluggable_webvie
> > > >> w
> > > >> >>>> >>>> >
> > > >> >>>> >>>> > I'm going to probably start with Crosswalk, because
> > > >> >>>> >>>> > it's
> > > >> probably
> > > >> >>>> the
> > > >> >>>> >>>> > most mature primary candidate in the Android
> > > >> >>>> >>>> > Third-Party
> > > >> WebView
> > > >> >>>> >>>> > thing, and I'm pretty sure the GeckoView will be
> > > >> >>>> >>>> > happening
> > > >> shortly
> > > >> >>>> >>>> > after.
> > > >> >>>> >>>> >
> > > >> >>>> >>>> > I don't know how this would work w.r.t. the CLI or
> > > >> >>>> >>>> > our
> > > >> workflow at
> > > >> >>>> >>>> > all, but at the moment, I really just want to at
> > > >> >>>> >>>> > least start
> > > >> to have
> > > >> >>>> >>>> > some headway towards 4.x and PhoneGap day.
> > > >> >>>> >>>> >
> > > >> >>>> >>>> > What do people think of this so far? I'm going to try
> > > >> >>>> >>>> > to clean
> > > >> >>>> things
> > > >> >>>> >>>> > up a bit, since we've definitely done a lot of things
> > > >> >>>> >>>> > that
> > > >> would
> > > >> >>>> make
> > > >> >>>> >>>> > first year CS profs freak the hell out (i.e. public
> > > >> >>>> >>>> > members in
> > > >> >>>> public
> > > >> >>>> >>>> > objects w.r.t. PluginManager).
> > > >> >>>> >>>> >
> > > >> >>>> >>>> > Thoughts?
> > > >> >>>> >>>> >
> > > >> >>>> >>>> > Joe
> > > >> >>>> >>>> >
> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> >>>
> > > >> >>>> >>>
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >>
> >

Reply via email to