Yup I'll track em down On Apr 23, 2014 7:17 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <agri...@chromium.org> wrote:
> Does anyone have a contact at moz that we could invite? > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> > wrote: > > Depends on their interest level I think. Faster we can get this out > > the door the better. If we need to delay for geckoview, then I don't > > think we should gate on it, just release it after. > > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Tommy Williams <to...@devgeeks.org> > wrote: > >> More engines, more better... > >> On 23 Apr 2014 16:32, "Joe Bowser" <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Hey > >>> > >>> A Hangout would have to happen on Friday at the earliest. It'd be > good if > >>> we could get someone from Mozilla on the hangout as well. I haven't > gotten > >>> MozillaView (GeckoView with Cordova methods) fully working yet. For > some > >>> reason it's not rendering on the screen. > >>> > >>> Ideally it'd be cool to have at least two options when this feature > finally > >>> lands. > >>> > >>> What do other people think? > >>> > >>> Joe > >>> On 22 Apr 2014 20:06, "Hu, Ningxin" <ningxin...@intel.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> > Joe, > >>> > > >>> > Thanks for your review and merge the PRs. > >>> > > >>> > To pluggable webview interest group: > >>> > Are we OK to setup a hangout this week for initial introduction and > >>> > discussion of next steps? > >>> > > >>> > Thanks, > >>> > -ningxin > >>> > > >>> > > -----Original Message----- > >>> > > From: Hu, Ningxin [mailto:ningxin...@intel.com] > >>> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 4:04 PM > >>> > > To: dev@cordova.apache.org > >>> > > Subject: RE: [Android] Refactoring for different engines > >>> > > > >>> > > The PoC is great! Quite excited about the direction! > >>> > > > >>> > > I've sent a PR to update the cordova-crosswalk-engine to latest > >>> crosswalk > >>> > > embedding API. It works with xwalk_core_library at 6.35.124.0. > >>> > > > >>> > > I've also changed the CordovaWebView interface slightly (adding > >>> > getView() API) > >>> > > to allow XWalkCordovaWebView to composite a XWalkView instead of > >>> > extending > >>> > > it. It resolves some API naming issues for XWalkView case. > >>> > > > >>> > > Please review them at: > >>> > > https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-crosswalk-engine/pull/3 > >>> > > https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-android/pull/2 > >>> > > > >>> > > Thanks, > >>> > > -ningxin > >>> > > > >>> > > > -----Original Message----- > >>> > > > From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bows...@gmail.com] > >>> > > > Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 12:45 AM > >>> > > > To: dev > >>> > > > Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Yeah, I'd be cool with setting up a hangout. Everyone should > take a > >>> > > > look at the PoC, I've basically distilled it down to four or five > >>> > > > classes so far, but with some work, we may be able to get it > down to > >>> > > > three. Due to legacy, we're pretty stuck with the Android > WebView > >>> API > >>> > calls, > >>> > > but these can probably be modified. > >>> > > > > >>> > > > It'd be good to get Mozilla people on the call as well, since > they > >>> > > > have their WebView as well. > >>> > > > > >>> > > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Hu, Ningxin < > ningxin...@intel.com> > >>> > wrote: > >>> > > > > Hangout would be a good idea. > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > FYI, I will be off next week. How about the week after next? > If it > >>> > > > > works, please > >>> > > > feel free to schedule one and count me in. > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > Thanks, > >>> > > > > -ningxin > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >>> > > > >> From: mmo...@google.com [mailto:mmo...@google.com] On Behalf > Of > >>> > > > >> Michal Mocny > >>> > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 11:39 PM > >>> > > > >> To: dev > >>> > > > >> Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> Would it be alright to set up a Hangout some time to introduce > >>> > everyone? > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> Joe has been leading the effort here, but there are other > cordova > >>> > > > >> contributors for whom this is top priority. It would be nice > if > >>> we > >>> > > > >> could all meet to say hello and make sure we are all going in > the > >>> > > > >> right > >>> > > > direction. > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> Quite exciting! > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> -Michal > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Hu, Ningxin < > >>> ningxin...@intel.com> > >>> > > wrote: > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > Joe, thanks for this. I am very excited. > >>> > > > >> > > >>> > > > >> > FYI. Crosswalk team is working on refactoring the WebView > API to > >>> > > > >> > support embedding usage better [1]. (Previously the layer > API > >>> was > >>> > > > >> > not exposed as public usage). > >>> > > > >> > > >>> > > > >> > I would like to review the PoC and work with you to get > >>> Crosswalk > >>> > > > >> > fits into the pluggable WebView architecture. > >>> > > > >> > > >>> > > > >> > Thanks, > >>> > > > >> > -ningxin > >>> > > > >> > > >>> > > > >> > > -----Original Message----- > >>> > > > >> > > From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bows...@gmail.com] > >>> > > > >> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 7:08 AM > >>> > > > >> > > To: dev > >>> > > > >> > > Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines > >>> > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > Hey > >>> > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > After debugging, I did some minor updates to the plugin > >>> README. > >>> > > > >> > > It > >>> > > > >> > should be > >>> > > > >> > > easier to get this up and running, although there's still > the > >>> > > > >> > > issue of > >>> > > > >> > after-install > >>> > > > >> > > hooks and the relative path weirdness with the Crosswalk > >>> > Library itself. > >>> > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > It still doesn't support the CLI at all, but it should be > >>> there > >>> > > > >> > > with the > >>> > > > >> > old flow. > >>> > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Michal Mocny > >>> > > > >> > > <mmo...@chromium.org> > >>> > > > >> > > wrote: > >>> > > > >> > > > (Sorry Joe, Googlers are down in California and way > busy. > >>> > > > >> > > > Will be back in a week. Super excited about this, > though.) > >>> > > > >> > > > > >>> > > > >> > > > -Michal > >>> > > > >> > > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > >>> > > > >> > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Joe Bowser > >>> > > > >> > > > <bows...@gmail.com> > >>> > > > >> wrote: > >>> > > > >> > > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> Reviving this thread! > >>> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> Can other people look at this, and see if/when we > should > >>> > land this? > >>> > > > >> > > >> I know that I have to re-write the tests still, but I > would > >>> > > > >> > > >> like some feedback before merging it in. Also, it'd be > >>> > > > >> > > >> super awesome if other people could try and make a > WebView > >>> > > > >> > > >> based on the interfaces and recommend which methods > should > >>> > > > >> > > >> die. I want to get this released in the next month or > so, > >>> > > > >> > > >> so any time and feedback would be greatly appreciated. > >>> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> Thanks > >>> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Joe Bowser > >>> > > > >> > > >> <bows...@gmail.com> > >>> > > > >> > wrote: > >>> > > > >> > > >> > Hey, I created the following today to track various > >>> > > > >> > > >> > WebView > >>> > > > >> > progresses: > >>> > > > >> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-6246 > >>> > > > >> > > >> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > I also have this repo created. The licensing is > ugly as > >>> > > > >> > > >> > all crap, but it's a Proof-Of-Concept: > >>> > > > >> > > >> > https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-crosswalk-engine > >>> > > > >> > > >> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > If I can get some help getting plugman to just load > >>> > > > >> > > >> > Crosswalk, it'll > >>> > > > >> > > >> look hawt. > >>> > > > >> > > >> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > BTW: We should probably get this ready to go into > Android > >>> > > > >> > > >> > in the next two months and deprecate the setProperty > >>> > > > >> > > >> > methods, since all properties should be preferences > in > >>> > config.xml > >>> > > now. > >>> > > > >> > > >> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Joe Bowser > >>> > > > >> > > >> > <bows...@gmail.com> > >>> > > > >> > > wrote: > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> Perhaps. There would be additional benefits to this > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> approach, namely fixes being added to that platform > more > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> quickly. I'll probably take a look at that once I > have > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> Crosswalk > >>> > > > finalized. > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Brian LeRoux > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> <b...@brian.io> > >>> > > > wrote: > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> this is great stuff > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> do we think it may be possible to bring in amazon > >>> fireos > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> stuff > >>> > > > >> > > >> eventually > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> too? > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Joe Bowser > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> <bows...@gmail.com> > >>> > > > >> > wrote: > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> BTW: I committed it in my repo, not the main > Apache > >>> one. > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Joe Bowser > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> <bows...@gmail.com> > >>> > > > >> > > wrote: > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > Hey > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > I just committed some code based on their > WebView > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > modifications that allows you to choose your > >>> renderer > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > in the > >>> > > > >> > config file > >>> > > > >> > > with this: > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > <preference name="webView" > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > > >>> value="org.apache.cordova.engine.crosswalk.XWalkCordo > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > va > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > Web > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > View > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > " /> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > You currently have to copy over the *.pak file > and > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > the jsapi from a Crosswalk Example project to > get > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > this to work. The next thing that I'm going to > do > >>> is > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > figure out how to write this as a plugin and > have it > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > install on a default > >>> > > > project. > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > Also, right now the bridge doesn't seem to > work, and > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > I don't know why exactly. That being said, the > >>> > > > >> > > >> fact > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > that I can choose which version of > Chrome/Chromium > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > I'm running with > >>> > > > >> > > >> a > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > single XML preference is HUGE. > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > There's definitely a lot more work that needs > to be > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > done, but as > >>> > > > >> > > >> long > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > as we have something that we can fit into the > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > interface, we should > >>> > > > >> > > >> be > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > able to put in things like GeckoView or other > third > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > party > >>> > > > >> > renderers. > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > The nightmare of being stuck with bullshit > WebView > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > bugs may soon be over. > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Michal Mocny > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > <mmo...@chromium.org> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> wrote: > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> > >>> https://github.com/crosswalk-project/crosswalk-cordo > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> va > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> -an > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> droi > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> d > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> First patch they landed, which claims to have > min > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> viable xwalk > >>> > > > >> > > >> webview: > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > >>> > > > >> > > >> > >>> https://github.com/crosswalk-project/crosswalk-cordova-andro > >>> > > > >> > > >> id > >>> > > > >> > > >> /co > >>> > > > >> > > >> mmit > >>> > > > >> > > >> /a04dedeb0204e7542d190312c6ae70c795a26e04 > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Michal Mocny > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> <mmo...@chromium.org > >>> > > > >> > > >> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> wrote: > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> I haven't looked yet, but did you see: > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> > >>> https://crosswalk-project.org/#wiki/crosswalk-cordo > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> va > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> -an > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> droi > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> d > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> ? > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Andrew > Grieve < > >>> > > > >> > > >> agri...@chromium.org > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >wrote: > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> First - very excited that you're working on > this! > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> Had a quick look. Not sure there's much to be > >>> > gleaned > >>> > > yet. > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> Once > >>> > > > >> > > >> you > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> start > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> in on hooking up x-walk's webview I think it > will > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> become more > >>> > > > >> > > >> obvious > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> what > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> the interface should look like. E.g., does > x-walk > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> even have the > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> concept of > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> ChromeClient vs WebViewClient vs WebView? > Also > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> unsure whether the > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> class > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> should extend android.View as well as > implement > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> our > >>> > > > >> > interface. > >>> > > > >> > > >> E.g. > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> alternative is to have a "getView()" method > on > >>> the > >>> > > > >> > interface. > >>> > > > >> > > >> Might > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> help > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> to > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> cut down on file sizes, and API surface, but > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> again, I'm not too > >>> > > > >> > > >> sure. > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> I've been pretty hesitant to touch existing > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> exposed members > >>> > > > >> > > >> (e.g. the > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> public fields you were referring to) since > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> touching anything > >>> > > > >> > > >> public > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> could > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> break plugins. That said, maybe now is a good > >>> time > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> to @deprecate > >>> > > > >> > > >> a > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> bunch > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> of > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> them and either replace them with getters, or > >>> just > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> declare them > >>> > > > >> > > >> to be > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> not > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> exposed to plugins. > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Joe Bowser > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> <bows...@gmail.com> > >>> > > > >> > > >> wrote: > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > So, after looking at the Crosswalk code > again, > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > I've decided to > >>> > > > >> > > >> take > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> a > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > quick stab at making things pluggable. I > don't > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > have a lot to > >>> > > > >> > > >> show > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> for > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > it, but with the help of Eclipse (which is > why > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > the generated interfaces look so screwed > up), I > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > managed to create some > >>> > > > >> > > >> interfaces > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> so > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > we can start shoehorning in other browser > >>> > renderers. > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > >>> https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-android/tree/pluggable_w > >>> > > > >> > > >> eb > >>> > > > >> > > >> vie > >>> > > > >> > > >> w > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > I'm going to probably start with Crosswalk, > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > because it's > >>> > > > >> > > >> probably > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> the > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > most mature primary candidate in the > Android > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > Third-Party > >>> > > > >> > > >> WebView > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > thing, and I'm pretty sure the GeckoView > will > >>> be > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > happening > >>> > > > >> > > >> shortly > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > after. > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > I don't know how this would work w.r.t. > the CLI > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > or our > >>> > > > >> > > >> workflow at > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > all, but at the moment, I really just want > to > >>> at > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > least start > >>> > > > >> > > >> to have > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > some headway towards 4.x and PhoneGap day. > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > What do people think of this so far? I'm > going > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > to try to clean > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> things > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > up a bit, since we've definitely done a > lot of > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > things that > >>> > > > >> > > >> would > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> make > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > first year CS profs freak the hell out > (i.e. > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > public members in > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> public > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > objects w.r.t. PluginManager). > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > Thoughts? > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > Joe > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > >>> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > > > >> > > >>> > > >>> >
