Sounds good. It really should create its own WebViewClient and WebChromeClients when they exist. I'll pull them into the repo later today. I also have to remove the dependency to xwalk_library from Cordova itself, since that's breaking the compile step on my work with Gecko. (Weird DEX Braille errors)
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Ian Clelland <iclell...@chromium.org> wrote: > I've managed to get this up and running now -- great work on this, Joe! > > Mobilespec runs on my N4, with 10 failing tests: 3 in contacts; 7 in > file-transfer. Otherwise, things seem to be working pretty well. > > I used a new build of Crosswalk, and found that the embedding API has > changed since the weekend (when Ningxin's patches applied). I've issued a > pull request at https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-crosswalk-engine/pull/5 > for it -- I'm not sure if there's a way to keep compatibility with last > week's Crosswalk, or if we'd even want to. (Ningxin, if you could take a > look at that PR and see if it makes sense, I'd appreciate it) > > Joe, I also had to patch the default constructor for XWalkCordovaWebView; it > wasn't creating its own client objects, so it got the default ones, and most > of the tests were failing because some component of the bridge wan't > working. https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-crosswalk-engine/pull/4 is out > for that. > > Count me in for the hangout -- this is exciting stuff > > Ian > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: >> >> Yup I'll track em down >> On Apr 23, 2014 7:17 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <agri...@chromium.org> wrote: >> >> > Does anyone have a contact at moz that we could invite? >> > >> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> >> > wrote: >> > > Depends on their interest level I think. Faster we can get this out >> > > the door the better. If we need to delay for geckoview, then I don't >> > > think we should gate on it, just release it after. >> > > >> > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Tommy Williams <to...@devgeeks.org> >> > wrote: >> > >> More engines, more better... >> > >> On 23 Apr 2014 16:32, "Joe Bowser" <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> Hey >> > >>> >> > >>> A Hangout would have to happen on Friday at the earliest. It'd be >> > good if >> > >>> we could get someone from Mozilla on the hangout as well. I haven't >> > gotten >> > >>> MozillaView (GeckoView with Cordova methods) fully working yet. For >> > some >> > >>> reason it's not rendering on the screen. >> > >>> >> > >>> Ideally it'd be cool to have at least two options when this feature >> > finally >> > >>> lands. >> > >>> >> > >>> What do other people think? >> > >>> >> > >>> Joe >> > >>> On 22 Apr 2014 20:06, "Hu, Ningxin" <ningxin...@intel.com> wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>> > Joe, >> > >>> > >> > >>> > Thanks for your review and merge the PRs. >> > >>> > >> > >>> > To pluggable webview interest group: >> > >>> > Are we OK to setup a hangout this week for initial introduction >> > >>> > and >> > >>> > discussion of next steps? >> > >>> > >> > >>> > Thanks, >> > >>> > -ningxin >> > >>> > >> > >>> > > -----Original Message----- >> > >>> > > From: Hu, Ningxin [mailto:ningxin...@intel.com] >> > >>> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 4:04 PM >> > >>> > > To: dev@cordova.apache.org >> > >>> > > Subject: RE: [Android] Refactoring for different engines >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > The PoC is great! Quite excited about the direction! >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > I've sent a PR to update the cordova-crosswalk-engine to latest >> > >>> crosswalk >> > >>> > > embedding API. It works with xwalk_core_library at 6.35.124.0. >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > I've also changed the CordovaWebView interface slightly (adding >> > >>> > getView() API) >> > >>> > > to allow XWalkCordovaWebView to composite a XWalkView instead of >> > >>> > extending >> > >>> > > it. It resolves some API naming issues for XWalkView case. >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > Please review them at: >> > >>> > > https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-crosswalk-engine/pull/3 >> > >>> > > https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-android/pull/2 >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > Thanks, >> > >>> > > -ningxin >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > > -----Original Message----- >> > >>> > > > From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bows...@gmail.com] >> > >>> > > > Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 12:45 AM >> > >>> > > > To: dev >> > >>> > > > Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Yeah, I'd be cool with setting up a hangout. Everyone should >> > take a >> > >>> > > > look at the PoC, I've basically distilled it down to four or >> > >>> > > > five >> > >>> > > > classes so far, but with some work, we may be able to get it >> > down to >> > >>> > > > three. Due to legacy, we're pretty stuck with the Android >> > WebView >> > >>> API >> > >>> > calls, >> > >>> > > but these can probably be modified. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > It'd be good to get Mozilla people on the call as well, since >> > they >> > >>> > > > have their WebView as well. >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Hu, Ningxin < >> > ningxin...@intel.com> >> > >>> > wrote: >> > >>> > > > > Hangout would be a good idea. >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > FYI, I will be off next week. How about the week after next? >> > If it >> > >>> > > > > works, please >> > >>> > > > feel free to schedule one and count me in. >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > Thanks, >> > >>> > > > > -ningxin >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> > >>> > > > >> From: mmo...@google.com [mailto:mmo...@google.com] On >> > >>> > > > >> Behalf >> > Of >> > >>> > > > >> Michal Mocny >> > >>> > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 11:39 PM >> > >>> > > > >> To: dev >> > >>> > > > >> Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines >> > >>> > > > >> >> > >>> > > > >> Would it be alright to set up a Hangout some time to >> > >>> > > > >> introduce >> > >>> > everyone? >> > >>> > > > >> >> > >>> > > > >> Joe has been leading the effort here, but there are other >> > cordova >> > >>> > > > >> contributors for whom this is top priority. It would be >> > >>> > > > >> nice >> > if >> > >>> we >> > >>> > > > >> could all meet to say hello and make sure we are all going >> > >>> > > > >> in >> > the >> > >>> > > > >> right >> > >>> > > > direction. >> > >>> > > > >> >> > >>> > > > >> Quite exciting! >> > >>> > > > >> >> > >>> > > > >> -Michal >> > >>> > > > >> >> > >>> > > > >> >> > >>> > > > >> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Hu, Ningxin < >> > >>> ningxin...@intel.com> >> > >>> > > wrote: >> > >>> > > > >> >> > >>> > > > >> > Joe, thanks for this. I am very excited. >> > >>> > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > >> > FYI. Crosswalk team is working on refactoring the WebView >> > API to >> > >>> > > > >> > support embedding usage better [1]. (Previously the layer >> > API >> > >>> was >> > >>> > > > >> > not exposed as public usage). >> > >>> > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > >> > I would like to review the PoC and work with you to get >> > >>> Crosswalk >> > >>> > > > >> > fits into the pluggable WebView architecture. >> > >>> > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > >> > Thanks, >> > >>> > > > >> > -ningxin >> > >>> > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > >> > > -----Original Message----- >> > >>> > > > >> > > From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bows...@gmail.com] >> > >>> > > > >> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 7:08 AM >> > >>> > > > >> > > To: dev >> > >>> > > > >> > > Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different >> > >>> > > > >> > > engines >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > > > >> > > Hey >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > > > >> > > After debugging, I did some minor updates to the plugin >> > >>> README. >> > >>> > > > >> > > It >> > >>> > > > >> > should be >> > >>> > > > >> > > easier to get this up and running, although there's >> > >>> > > > >> > > still >> > the >> > >>> > > > >> > > issue of >> > >>> > > > >> > after-install >> > >>> > > > >> > > hooks and the relative path weirdness with the >> > >>> > > > >> > > Crosswalk >> > >>> > Library itself. >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > > > >> > > It still doesn't support the CLI at all, but it should >> > >>> > > > >> > > be >> > >>> there >> > >>> > > > >> > > with the >> > >>> > > > >> > old flow. >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > > > >> > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Michal Mocny >> > >>> > > > >> > > <mmo...@chromium.org> >> > >>> > > > >> > > wrote: >> > >>> > > > >> > > > (Sorry Joe, Googlers are down in California and way >> > busy. >> > >>> > > > >> > > > Will be back in a week. Super excited about this, >> > though.) >> > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > > > -Michal >> > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Joe Bowser >> > >>> > > > >> > > > <bows...@gmail.com> >> > >>> > > > >> wrote: >> > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> Reviving this thread! >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> Can other people look at this, and see if/when we >> > should >> > >>> > land this? >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> I know that I have to re-write the tests still, but >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> I >> > would >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> like some feedback before merging it in. Also, it'd >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> be >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> super awesome if other people could try and make a >> > WebView >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> based on the interfaces and recommend which methods >> > should >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> die. I want to get this released in the next month >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> or >> > so, >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> so any time and feedback would be greatly >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> appreciated. >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> Thanks >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Joe Bowser >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> <bows...@gmail.com> >> > >>> > > > >> > wrote: >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> > Hey, I created the following today to track >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> > various >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> > WebView >> > >>> > > > >> > progresses: >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-6246 >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> > I also have this repo created. The licensing is >> > ugly as >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> > all crap, but it's a Proof-Of-Concept: >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> > https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-crosswalk-engine >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> > If I can get some help getting plugman to just >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> > load >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> > Crosswalk, it'll >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> look hawt. >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> > BTW: We should probably get this ready to go into >> > Android >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> > in the next two months and deprecate the >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> > setProperty >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> > methods, since all properties should be >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> > preferences >> > in >> > >>> > config.xml >> > >>> > > now. >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Joe Bowser >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> > <bows...@gmail.com> >> > >>> > > > >> > > wrote: >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> Perhaps. There would be additional benefits to >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> this >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> approach, namely fixes being added to that >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> platform >> > more >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> quickly. I'll probably take a look at that once >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> I >> > have >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> Crosswalk >> > >>> > > > finalized. >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Brian LeRoux >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> <b...@brian.io> >> > >>> > > > wrote: >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> this is great stuff >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> do we think it may be possible to bring in >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> amazon >> > >>> fireos >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> stuff >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> eventually >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> too? >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Joe Bowser >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> <bows...@gmail.com> >> > >>> > > > >> > wrote: >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> BTW: I committed it in my repo, not the main >> > Apache >> > >>> one. >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Joe Bowser >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> <bows...@gmail.com> >> > >>> > > > >> > > wrote: >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > Hey >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > I just committed some code based on their >> > WebView >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > modifications that allows you to choose your >> > >>> renderer >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > in the >> > >>> > > > >> > config file >> > >>> > > > >> > > with this: >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > <preference name="webView" >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>> value="org.apache.cordova.engine.crosswalk.XWalkCordo >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > va >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > Web >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > View >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > " /> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > You currently have to copy over the *.pak >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > file >> > and >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > the jsapi from a Crosswalk Example project to >> > get >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > this to work. The next thing that I'm going >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > to >> > do >> > >>> is >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > figure out how to write this as a plugin and >> > have it >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > install on a default >> > >>> > > > project. >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > Also, right now the bridge doesn't seem to >> > work, and >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > I don't know why exactly. That being said, >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > the >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> fact >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > that I can choose which version of >> > Chrome/Chromium >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > I'm running with >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> a >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > single XML preference is HUGE. >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > There's definitely a lot more work that needs >> > to be >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > done, but as >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> long >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > as we have something that we can fit into the >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > interface, we should >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> be >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > able to put in things like GeckoView or other >> > third >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > party >> > >>> > > > >> > renderers. >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > The nightmare of being stuck with bullshit >> > WebView >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > bugs may soon be over. >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Michal Mocny >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > <mmo...@chromium.org> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> wrote: >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> >> > >>> https://github.com/crosswalk-project/crosswalk-cordo >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> va >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> -an >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> droi >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> d >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> First patch they landed, which claims to >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> have >> > min >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> viable xwalk >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> webview: >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> > >>> https://github.com/crosswalk-project/crosswalk-cordova-andro >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> id >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> /co >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> mmit >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> /a04dedeb0204e7542d190312c6ae70c795a26e04 >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Michal >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> Mocny >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> <mmo...@chromium.org >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> wrote: >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> I haven't looked yet, but did you see: >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> >> > >>> https://crosswalk-project.org/#wiki/crosswalk-cordo >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> va >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> -an >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> droi >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> d >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> ? >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Andrew >> > Grieve < >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> agri...@chromium.org >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >wrote: >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> First - very excited that you're working >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> on >> > this! >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> Had a quick look. Not sure there's much to >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> be >> > >>> > gleaned >> > >>> > > yet. >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> Once >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> you >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> start >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> in on hooking up x-walk's webview I think >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> it >> > will >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> become more >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> obvious >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> what >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> the interface should look like. E.g., does >> > x-walk >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> even have the >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> concept of >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> ChromeClient vs WebViewClient vs WebView? >> > Also >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> unsure whether the >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> class >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> should extend android.View as well as >> > implement >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> our >> > >>> > > > >> > interface. >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> E.g. >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> alternative is to have a "getView()" >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> method >> > on >> > >>> the >> > >>> > > > >> > interface. >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> Might >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> help >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> to >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> cut down on file sizes, and API surface, >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> but >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> again, I'm not too >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> sure. >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> I've been pretty hesitant to touch >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> existing >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> exposed members >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> (e.g. the >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> public fields you were referring to) since >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> touching anything >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> public >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> could >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> break plugins. That said, maybe now is a >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> good >> > >>> time >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> to @deprecate >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> a >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> bunch >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> of >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> them and either replace them with getters, >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> or >> > >>> just >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> declare them >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> to be >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> not >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> exposed to plugins. >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Joe Bowser >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> <bows...@gmail.com> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> wrote: >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > So, after looking at the Crosswalk code >> > again, >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > I've decided to >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> take >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> a >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > quick stab at making things pluggable. >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > I >> > don't >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > have a lot to >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> show >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> for >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > it, but with the help of Eclipse (which >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > is >> > why >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > the generated interfaces look so screwed >> > up), I >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > managed to create some >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> interfaces >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> so >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > we can start shoehorning in other >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > browser >> > >>> > renderers. >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> > >>> https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-android/tree/pluggable_w >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> eb >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> vie >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> w >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > I'm going to probably start with >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > Crosswalk, >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > because it's >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> probably >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> the >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > most mature primary candidate in the >> > Android >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > Third-Party >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> WebView >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > thing, and I'm pretty sure the GeckoView >> > will >> > >>> be >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > happening >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> shortly >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > after. >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > I don't know how this would work w.r.t. >> > the CLI >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > or our >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> workflow at >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > all, but at the moment, I really just >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > want >> > to >> > >>> at >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > least start >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> to have >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > some headway towards 4.x and PhoneGap >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > day. >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > What do people think of this so far? I'm >> > going >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > to try to clean >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> things >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > up a bit, since we've definitely done a >> > lot of >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > things that >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> would >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> make >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > first year CS profs freak the hell out >> > (i.e. >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > public members in >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> public >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > objects w.r.t. PluginManager). >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > Thoughts? >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > Joe >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> > >>> > > > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> >> > > >
