Hi Saransh, The Fineract PMC or Committers do not pay anyone here to do development on the Fineract codebase. The PMC does not manage a budget for developing Fineract. We are all volunteers here and contribute as individuals not companies.
If you want to hire a Developer to do work on Fineract, then you have to manage that outside of Fineract. Hire someone at your foundation and define their role and get them to fix issues if you like. But they have to fix issues which the community wants and needs. If you want to do any of the tasks which I highlighted in my earlier email then go ahead. If you want to rewrite Fineract CN or Fineract CN, then fork the project and call it a different name and take the discussion to another forum and leave the majority of people here who believe in Fineract CN to stay on. You can even create your own new Apache Project if that is what you want.. Apache Incubator is there to guide you. The community at this time does not want to change the language, framework or architecture of Fineract CN at this time. We want to test, improve and release what is already available. On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 4:13 PM Saransh Sharma <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't know what this email means. I am not asking you to enter in any > kind of business with me? It's a grant Myrle, I mean it's not a typical > business transaction. Grant from a non profit that could help developers > and contributors to work together nothing else ,I am not going to influence > anyone in any way. > > Actually zero trust protocol aka Blockchain does help in such transactions > by the way , the idea that we need to trust someone is already flawed in > many ways. > > I neve dismissed Sander; he raised an interesting point but I highlighted > why the point is no longer valid. > > Banking the unbanked by also a solution that the unbanked cannot manage or > use , that is what we are trying to solve. > > > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 7:46 PM Myrle Krantz <[email protected]> wrote: > >> So much wrong here, I'm just gonna skip to the end. >> >> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 3:09 PM Saransh Sharma <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Ok , understood we can put more fire power once we get this rolling, but >>> if you look at the work I asked was to develop the Proposal not actual >>> development, think that's a lot ? >>> >> >> Saransh, I do not trust you, and won't be entering into a business >> relationship with you already for that reason. But even if I did, your >> management approach here is completely wrong: you are trying to replace >> intrinsic motivation to bank the unbanked, or build a software architecture >> I can believe in, or (equally valid) build a business that I can own. You >> are trying to replace that intrinsic motivation with extrinsic motivation >> of $1500 and <handwave> blockchain. (Which, given the way you dismissed >> Sander, you clearly don't understand either.) I shouldn't need to tell you >> that that is... unlikely to lead to your own success. The people here have >> earned more dignity than that. >> >> Best Regards, >> Myrle >> > > > -- > Thanks and regards, > > Saransh Sharma > Research Partner > > This mail is governed by Muellners® IT policy. > The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents > may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from > disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if > this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert > the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any > attachments. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents > of this message by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly > prohibited. All messages sent to and from this e-mail address may be > monitored as permitted by applicable law and regulations to ensure > compliance with our internal policies and to protect our business. E-mails > are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be > intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. You are deemed > to have accepted these risks if you communicate with us by e-mail. >
