On 3/25/13 11:44 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>>> I have to set up the JS part of the FlexJS parsing. I've got the MXML
>>> in place, but the JS part will take me a bit of time. Are you up
>>> against a deadline somehow?
>>>
>> Oh, I thought it was all there. Is it only MXML->AS? I am setting up my
>> launch config now. What is FlexJS specific about the parsing? Or did you
>> mean emitting?
>
> Yes, you are correct, I meant emitting. We can subclass the FlexJS
> emitter from the Goog emitter I did for VanillaSDK, which gives us
> about 95% of the desired output. There are some differences in the
> output between 'goog' and FlexJS (mainly in the handling of accessors)
> that I'll have to write before we can move FlexJS to FalconJx. This
> will take me a couple of days to get right.
>
OK. I have some other Adobe folks experimenting with FalconJS and FlexJS.
I might make some FalconJS changes to keep them happy.
What is the difference between goog and FlexJS? It might be better to make
FlexJS goog-compliant.
I'm stopping for tonight so I'll read your response in my morning.
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
