Hi Jeffry,

exactly. As I report when I first proposed the name, as hidden bonus is the
codename used when Flex was initially created at Macromedia sometime in
2001 or 2002. I always liked that name since it evocate to me something
"magnificent", "superb", "marvelous"...as our project is ;)


2017-09-14 3:35 GMT+02:00 Jeffry Houser <jef...@dot-com-it.com>:

> Wasn't Royale the beta name for some version of Flex?  [Flex 2? or was it
> Flex 1?]
>
>
> On 9/13/2017 6:30 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>> Hi -
>>
>> I did a quick suitable name search.
>>
>> Royale might be taken by this individual’s project
>> https://github.com/ian-culleton/royale
>>
>> Otherwise Royale in a TESS search is liquor and beauty products mostly.
>> There is a lot of “Clash Royale"
>>
>> And there is also “Royale with Cheese” - a reference in Pulp Fiction to
>> what a Macdonald’s Quarter Pounder is called in Paris.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dave
>>
>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 3:09 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net <mailto:
>>> dave2w...@comcast.net>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi -
>>>
>>> We have one alternative name - Royale
>>>
>>> Are there others that people would like to propose?
>>>
>>> If not then we can have a simple VOTE between FlexJS and Royale.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Dave
>>>
>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net <mailto:
>>>> dave2w...@comcast.net>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Om,
>>>>
>>>> I think that dilutes the votes and biases the result towards FlexJS. If
>>>> we want to go that way then we need a preference ranking and more
>>>> complicated VOTE counting.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Dave
>>>>
>>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 2:57 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com
>>>>> <mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> We could always structure the VOTE like this:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1.  Royale
>>>>> 2.  XXX
>>>>> 3.  YYY
>>>>> 4.  FlexJS
>>>>>
>>>>> One vote should answer both questions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Om
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <
>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On the other hand, we have rather majority of voices for do not change
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> name and Alex is right. - I'm seeing more people asking for help with
>>>>>> porting. - We may disappear in the sea of frameworks with changed
>>>>>> name...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe better have solid framework and invest in current name still
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> nice branding. I'm puzzled, so definitely I will give myself at least
>>>>>> one
>>>>>> day more before VOTE.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2017-09-13 23:31 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
>>>>>> <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 for Dave's proposition on starting the VOTE for name change.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would like to also add that Carlos's proposition for help to build
>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>> brand triggers me. Peter helped also do understand that we can always
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> state
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> from where we have come and what was our story.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm going to change my mind on name changing and pickup "Royale" as
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> most powerful for the new one. - The main question is can we use it
>>>>>>> since
>>>>>>> it was code name of Macromedia Framework ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2017-09-13 22:59 GMT+02:00 Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net
>>>>>>> <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi -
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 1:40 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com <mailto:
>>>>>>>>> harbs.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Carlos’ argument carries weight to me.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If a new name will help motivate him in terms of marketing it,
>>>>>>>>> that’s
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> value I can recognize.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The name is not as important to me as motivating people to be
>>>>>>>>> involved
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> in the project. We can build whatever messages we want around the
>>>>>>>> name.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Carlos clearly feels more passionate about his position than I do
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> mine.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A hesitation I have about picking a new name is that I don’t want
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> delay the board’s decision on the new PMC. If we go for a new name
>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> try and pick one quickly?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Let's start the FlexJS yes or no vote tonight or tomorrow morning.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In parallel we can discuss other names if a new name is the result
>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>> we can immediately start the next vote. We have just enough time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Dave
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Harbs
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 9:20 PM, Carlos Rovira <
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com <mailto:carlos.rovira@codeosco
>>>>>>>> pic.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm putting some efforts here since I think this is really
>>>>>>>>>> important
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> all of us and for our beloved FlexJS project.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Name, website and all the visuals behind it matters....and is
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> important in
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> a way many of us in this community maybe can't imagine. If we don't
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> get a
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> fresh and compelling name and a clean and beautiful site where we
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> explain
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> all the great things our technology can do, we are losing our time,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> since
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> this project will end with the bulk of the others xxxJS projects,
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> that's even horrible when our tech could be used for things other
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> JS!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> (If we want in future years to make it possible).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: I Think we can't have a PROJECT name != of PRODUCT name for
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> mobile: +48 880 859 557 <+48%20880%20859%20557>
>>>>>>> skype: zarzycki10
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki
>>>>>>> <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>>>>>
>>>>>> mobile: +48 880 859 557
>>>>>> skype: zarzycki10
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki
>>>>>> <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> --
> Jeffry Houser
> Technical Entrepreneur
> http://www.dot-com-it.com
> http://www.jeffryhouser.com
> 203-379-0773
>
>


-- 

<http://www.codeoscopic.com>

Carlos Rovira

Director General

M: +34 607 22 60 05

http://www.codeoscopic.com

http://www.avant2.es


Conocenos en 1 minuto! <https://youtu.be/P2IEAYDG5HU>


Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.

De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.

Reply via email to