Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/experimental mod_cache.c

[Graham Leggett]

Bill Stoddard wrote:

> Yep, you definitely need CACHE_OUT to be a CONTENT filter in this case since 
>INCLUDES is a
> CONTENT filter and you need INCLUDES to be run after CACHE_OUT.

I disagree - includes is something that should be cached as it is a
performance bottleneck.

If mod_includes needs to bypass the cache then Cache-Control directives
should be applied. 

If the user specifies "cache this URL range" it would be wrong to
override the user's wishes and not cache something.

Regards,
Graham
-- 
-----------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                "There's a moon
                                        over Bourbon Street
                                                tonight..."

S/MIME Cryptographic Signature