* "Manni Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Having proxy_ajp included in httpd v2.0 would be a good thing - there is
> > > a base of users for it (with it's more advanced handling of things like
> > > indicating secure connections, etc it's useful).
>
> > Hmm. I'd include rather in tomcat distribution than httpd-2.0. That seems
> > to be way more logical.
>
> I'd include it in Apache, not Tomcat.
>
> It's an apache module, after all,
oh? Like all the other hundreds of modules out there? mod_perl? mod_python?
Sorry, that's not an argument.
nd
--
Gefunden auf einer "Webdesigner"-Seite:
> Programmierung in HTML, XML, WML, CGI, FLASH <
# Andr� Malo # http://pub.perlig.de/ #
