* "Manni Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Having proxy_ajp included in httpd v2.0 would be a good thing - there is > > > a base of users for it (with it's more advanced handling of things like > > > indicating secure connections, etc it's useful). > > > Hmm. I'd include rather in tomcat distribution than httpd-2.0. That seems > > to be way more logical. > > I'd include it in Apache, not Tomcat. > > It's an apache module, after all,
oh? Like all the other hundreds of modules out there? mod_perl? mod_python? Sorry, that's not an argument. nd -- Gefunden auf einer "Webdesigner"-Seite: > Programmierung in HTML, XML, WML, CGI, FLASH < # André Malo # http://pub.perlig.de/ #